Robotic Kitting Alignment Using Vision and Force Feedback

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic systems struggle to efficiently assemble kits of parts with varying shapes, sizes, and materials, particularly those requiring fine motor control and handling fragile or irregularly shaped items.

Innovation Solution

A robotic kitting machine system that uses a combination of position control, force control, and computer vision to pick and place parts into corresponding slots in a tote, employing a suction-type end effector and cameras for precise alignment and insertion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If robots are used to perform assembly tasks, then productivity and consistency are improved, but the ability to handle fragile items and perform fine motor control deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly speedVSAvoidhandling of fragile items
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system dynamically adjusts control parameters including force thresholds, insertion speeds, and compliance settings based on real-time feedback from force sensors and vision systems. This allows the robot to handle fragile items with appropriate care while maintaining high productivity for robust components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates force sensors, torque sensors, and vision systems that provide real-time feedback during pick-and-place operations. This feedback enables closed-loop control where the robot adjusts its actions based on sensed forces and positions, ensuring fragile items are handled gently while maintaining assembly precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If tight tolerance slots are used to protect parts, then part protection is improved, but the difficulty of robotic insertion deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepart protectionVSAvoidinsertion difficulty
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system employs dynamic insertion strategies where insertion speed, force, and angle are continuously adjusted based on real-time feedback from force sensors and vision systems. The robot can slow down and apply precise forces when approaching tight tolerance slots, then speed up for more tolerant insertions, optimizing both part protection and operational simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces traditional mechanical positioning and alignment mechanisms with sensor-based guidance. Vision systems capture images of slot positions, and force sensors detect alignment and insertion forces, allowing the robot to adapt to variations in slot positions without requiring complex mechanical alignment fixtures.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple part types with varying shapes and materials are assembled, then kit versatility is improved, but the complexity of robotic manipulation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvekit configuration flexibilityVSAvoidmanipulation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system uses a universal end effector with interchangeable grippers and adaptive compliance mechanisms that can handle multiple part types. The vision system and force sensors provide universal detection capabilities that work across different materials and geometries, allowing a single robotic system to assemble diverse kit configurations without requiring specialized mechanisms for each part type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts manipulation parameters such as gripper force, insertion speed, approach angle, and compliance settings based on real-time identification of part properties from vision systems and force feedback. This allows the same robotic manipulator to handle fragile electronics, robust mechanical parts, and irregularly shaped components by changing its control parameters rather than its physical structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient and accurate assembly of kits without human intervention, ensuring parts are securely placed and protected from damage, even in tight tolerances, thereby improving manufacturing efficiency and reducing part damage.

Implementation Method 1

employing a suction-type end effector and cameras for precise alignment and insertion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectVacuum suction: Suction

Data Source

PatentUS12240123B2Robotic kitting machine
Publication Date: 2025.03.04 DEXTERITY INC
  • US12240123B2 patent drawing
  • US12240123B2 patent drawing
  • US12240123B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic kitting machine is disclosed. In various embodiments, a robotic arm is used to move an item to a location in proximity to a slot into which the item is to be inserted. Force information generated by a force sensor is received via a communication interface. The force sensor information is used to align a structure comprising the item with a corresponding cavity comprising the slot, and the item is inserted into the slot.