Vision-Guided Robotic Lawn Edger for Wire-Free Boundary Tracking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional robotic lawn edgers and mowers rely on guide wires or markers to determine boundaries for tasks like edging and mowing, which limits their flexibility and autonomy, and face challenges with self-positioning accuracy due to drift issues from IMU-based systems.

Innovation Solution

A motorized wheeled chassis equipped with computer vision and deep learning capabilities, using image and depth data from cameras to determine alignment and position corrections, allowing for boundary detection and task performance without guide wires, and addressing self-positioning drift through algorithms like ICP and ORB feature selection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If guide wires or markers are used to determine boundaries, then the robotic system can perform lawn edging and mowing tasks, but the system loses flexibility and autonomy

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveautonomyVSAvoidflexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical guide wires and physical markers with computer vision-based boundary detection. The system uses cameras to capture images and deep learning algorithms to identify boundaries, replacing the need for physical guidance infrastructure and enabling autonomous operation without external guides.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system performs self-positioning and self-navigation by detecting boundaries and features in its environment using onboard sensors and processing algorithms. The system determines its own location and orientation without external guidance, making the system self-sufficient and autonomous.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If IMU-based self-positioning is used, then the robotic system can navigate autonomously, but drift issues reduce positioning accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-positioning accuracyVSAvoidpositioning stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses computer vision to continuously detect boundaries and environmental features, providing feedback to correct positioning drift. By comparing detected features with expected positions, the system can identify and compensate for drift accumulation, maintaining long-term positioning accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent combines IMU-based inertial navigation with computer vision-based feature detection and boundary following. This fusion of multiple positioning methods allows the system to leverage the short-term accuracy of IMU while using vision feedback to correct long-term drift, achieving both precision and reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Extent of automation

If computer vision and deep learning are implemented without guide wires, then autonomy and flexibility improve, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveautonomyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex mechanical guidance systems (guide wires, physical markers, external infrastructure) with software-based computer vision and deep learning algorithms. This substitution reduces mechanical complexity while achieving equivalent or superior functionality through intelligent processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

4Measurement precision

If additional sensor data and neural networks are used for self-positioning correction, then positioning accuracy improves, but computational requirements and processing time increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveself-positioning accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-trains deep learning models on simulated and real-world data before deployment. This preliminary training allows the neural network to quickly process real-time sensor data during operation, reducing inference time while maintaining high accuracy in boundary and feature detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20230320262A1Computer vision and deep learning robotic lawn edger and mower
Publication Date: 2023.10.12 TYSONS COMPUTER VISION LLC
  • US20230320262A1 patent drawing
  • US20230320262A1 patent drawing
  • US20230320262A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An autonomous vehicle for performing gardening tasks, the vehicle including a motorized wheeled chassis with at least one motor providing power to a plurality of wheels, at least one rotating wheel attached to the motorized wheeled chassis, a line or blade extending from the rotating wheel configured to perform a selected gardening task, at least one of a downward-facing camera or an outward-facing camera, and a processor configured to control processing related to determining a position of the motorized wheeled chassis, driving the at least one motor to move one or more of the plurality of wheels, rotating the at least one rotating wheel when the selected gardening task is performed, and correcting a path of the motorized wheeled chassis based on one or more images obtained from the at least one of the downward-facing camera or the outward-facing camera.