Robotic End-of-Arm Linkage for Direct Force Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing end-of-arm tool assemblies for robotic manipulators rely on indirect force control schemes that require extra force sensors and are prone to instability due to contact modeling errors, lack safety in interaction, and are not backdrivable.

Innovation Solution

A direct force control scheme is implemented using a linkage assembly with low friction transmission between an actuator and finger assemblies, allowing precise force control without external measurement, and enabling mechanical backdrivability.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If indirect force control schemes are used with position control or force plus position control, then the control system can operate with standard position control mechanisms, but the system requires extra force sensors at contact areas and is prone to instability due to contact modelling errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol stabilityVSAvoidnumber of force sensors
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The linkage assembly serves itself to provide force feedback through its mechanical structure. The low-friction transmission mechanism inherently reflects the relationship between actuator force and finger force without requiring external sensors, making the system self-measuring and eliminating the need for separate force sensing components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces electronic force sensing and control systems with a mechanical transmission system. The linkage assembly's low-friction mechanical connection directly translates actuator force to finger force, substituting complex electronic force control with simple mechanical force transmission that is inherently stable and sensorless

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If indirect force control through position is used, then the control can be implemented with position control schemes, but the control is prone to instability and poor control performance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol implementationVSAvoidcontrol performance
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces position-based indirect force control with direct force control through a low-friction mechanical linkage. The transmission mechanism directly couples actuator force to finger force, eliminating the need for position-to-force transformation and associated modeling errors, thereby improving control performance while maintaining ease of implementation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The linkage assembly acts as an intermediary mechanical element that directly transmits force from the actuator to the finger assemblies. This mechanical mediator provides a direct force control pathway that bypasses the indirect position control route, eliminating instability caused by contact modeling while keeping the control system simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Force

If traditional actuator and transmission mechanisms are used, then the tool assembly can provide sufficient force, but the assembly is not backdrivable and less safe to interact with

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegripping forceVSAvoidbackdrivability
Core Design Contradiction:
ForceVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the friction parameter of the transmission system by using a low-friction linkage assembly. This parameter change enables backdrivability while maintaining sufficient gripping force, as the low friction allows manual override when needed but still transmits actuator force effectively during normal operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The linkage assembly provides dynamic characteristics that allow the system to switch between actuated mode (sufficient gripping force) and manual backdrive mode (safe interaction). The low-friction mechanical connection enables the system to be driven in either direction depending on the operational requirement, providing adaptability between force generation and safe manual operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Power

If intermediate transmission devices such as gearing arrangements are used between actuator and linkage assembly, then the system can provide mechanical advantage, but backlash is introduced leading to errors in applied force

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical advantageVSAvoidforce accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and removes the intermediate gearing arrangement from the transmission system. By eliminating the gear train, the design achieves direct force transmission from actuator to linkage assembly, removing the source of backlash while maintaining mechanical advantage through the direct mechanical connection and leverage principles

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges the actuator and linkage assembly into a directly connected system without intermediate transmission elements. This consolidation eliminates the interface between separate components where backlash would occur, creating a unified force transmission path that maintains precision while preserving mechanical advantage through direct mechanical coupling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution provides precise direct force control and mechanical backdrivability, ensuring safe interaction and minimizing backlash, making it suitable for handling items with varying characteristics.

Implementation Method 1

the linkage assembly is a low friction transmission device or arrangement, which, in this instance, is used to convert output force of the actuator to axially reciprocating movement of the finger assemblies

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS20260070236A1End-of-arm tool assembly for a robotic manipulator
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 OCADO INNOVATION LTD
  • US20260070236A1 patent drawing
  • US20260070236A1 patent drawing
  • US20260070236A1 patent drawing

AI summary

An end-of-arm tool assembly (16) for a robotic arm, the tool assembly comprising a housing (102) and an actuator (102) comprising two counter-moving components (104). The actuator is mounted within the housing such that both counter-moving components are movable. The tool assembly further comprises a linkage assembly (114) comprising two linkage subassemblies (116a, 116b). Each linkage sub-assembly connects the actuator to a finger assembly (120, 122). The actuator and link-age assembly are configured such that one of the linkage subassemblies is driven by one of the counter-moving components and the other of the linkage subassemblies is driven by the other of the counter-moving components.