Robotic Maintenance Quality Feedback for Substrate Processing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Manual maintenance work in substrate processing systems results in variations in work quality, necessitating a system to ensure consistency.

Innovation Solution

A maintenance work support system comprising a work robot, stowable work robots, and conveying robots, equipped with measurement and determination units to ensure work quality is met by adjusting operations until predetermined criteria are satisfied.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual maintenance work is performed by workers, then flexibility and adaptability in handling various maintenance tasks are improved, but consistency and reliability of work quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability in handling maintenance tasksVSAvoidconsistency of work quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The robot performs maintenance work autonomously without continuous human intervention. The control unit automatically controls the robot to execute maintenance operations based on predetermined conditions, enabling the system to serve itself and eliminate variability introduced by manual operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters from manual control to automated robotic control. By transforming the maintenance execution from human-operated to robot-operated, the system maintains adaptability through programmable instructions while ensuring consistent quality through standardized automated processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If a robot is introduced to support maintenance work, then consistency in work quality is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconsistency of work qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robot is designed with multi-functionality to perform various maintenance tasks including cleaning, inspection, and repair operations. By consolidating multiple maintenance functions into a single robotic system, the patent reduces overall system complexity compared to having separate specialized equipment for each task while maintaining consistent quality across different maintenance operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The measurement unit continuously monitors maintenance work quality and provides feedback to the control unit. When the measurement result indicates unsatisfactory quality, the control unit automatically executes additional operations to correct the issue, creating a closed-loop control system that ensures quality consistency without requiring complex manual intervention protocols.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If additional operations are performed to ensure work quality, then reliability of maintenance outcome is improved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvework quality satisfactionVSAvoidmaintenance work efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The measurement unit provides real-time feedback on maintenance work quality, enabling the control unit to make immediate decisions about whether additional operations are needed. This feedback mechanism ensures that additional operations are performed only when necessary to meet quality standards, avoiding unnecessary rework that would reduce productivity while maintaining reliable quality outcomes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual mechanical operations with automated robotic operations. The robot can perform additional maintenance operations more quickly and consistently than manual workers, so even when multiple operations are required to achieve quality standards, the overall productivity is maintained or improved due to the faster execution capability of the robotic system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentEP4682937A1Maintenance work assistance system, control method, and control program
Publication Date: 2026.01.21 TOKYO ELECTRON LTD
  • EP4682937A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4682937A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4682937A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

To ensure consistency in quality of maintenance work, a maintenance work support system including a work robot for performing maintenance work for each work item includes: a measurement unit configured to measure a measurement-target part specified for a target work item every time maintenance work for the work item is performed; a determination unit configured to determine whether or not a measurement result measured by the measurement unit satisfies a work quality set for the work item; and a control unit configured to, when it is determined that the work quality is not satisfied, control an additional operation for the maintenance work for the work item to be performed until the determination unit determines that the work quality is satisfied.