Robotic Manipulandum with Passive Wrist for 3D Workspace Motion

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic devices for upper-limb rehabilitation, such as manipulanda and exoskeletons, fail to fully regulate patient arm posture, allow non-planar movements, and provide inadequate gravity compensation, leading to mechanical constraints and high costs.

Innovation Solution

An electromechanical manipulandum device with a drive system, arm, capstan transmission, and end-effector providing three degrees-of-freedom motion, controlled by a system to apply forces and compensate for gravity, allowing for a large workspace and ease of setup.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If exoskeleton devices are used to produce 3D arm motion, then spatial movement capability is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial movement capabilityVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The device segments the motion control into two independent parts: a passive spherical wrist mechanism that provides 3D spatial movement capability without actuation, and a separate planar parallel manipulator that provides actuated control in the horizontal plane. This segmentation allows the device to achieve 3D motion capability while keeping the actuated mechanism simple and cost-effective.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention adds a passive spherical wrist mechanism that operates in the vertical dimension without requiring actuators. This allows the device to provide 3D spatial movement capability while the actuation system remains confined to the simpler planar horizontal dimension, reducing overall device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If exoskeleton kinematics are used to conform to skeletal system, then anatomical matching is improved, but mechanical constraint and setup complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveanatomical matchingVSAvoidsetup complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device separates the anatomical conforming function (passive spherical wrist) from the actuated control function (planar parallel manipulator). The passive wrist naturally conforms to the user's arm anatomy without requiring complex adjustment mechanisms, while the actuated planar mechanism uses standard parallel manipulator kinematics that are simpler to configure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The passive spherical wrist mechanism self-adapts to the user's arm anatomy through its inherent degrees of freedom, eliminating the need for complex adjustment mechanisms. The mechanism automatically conforms to the user's posture requirements without requiring therapist intervention for mechanical adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Strength

If high gear ratio is introduced to address motor inertia, then static load capability is improved, but backdriveability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestatic load capabilityVSAvoidbackdriveability
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The device applies actuation forces partially, only in the horizontal plane where they are most effective for rehabilitation exercises. The vertical dimension relies on passive gravity compensation and user effort, eliminating the need for high gear ratios that would compromise backdriveability in the actuated directions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The device uses passive gravity compensation mechanisms to counteract the weight of the manipulator arms, eliminating the need for high gear ratios to provide static load capability. This allows the use of direct-drive or low-gear-ratio motors that maintain good backdriveability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #8Anti-weight (Counterweight)

4Ease of operation

If planar manipulandum design is used, then transparency is improved, but 3D workspace capability deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovetransparencyVSAvoid3D workspace capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The device segments the workspace capability into a passive 3D spherical wrist mechanism that provides full spatial movement without affecting transparency, and an actuated planar parallel manipulator that maintains mechanical transparency while providing controlled forces in the horizontal plane.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention adds 3D workspace capability through a passive spherical wrist mechanism that operates in the vertical dimension without introducing mechanical constraints that would reduce transparency. The actuated planar mechanism maintains transparency while the passive wrist extends capability to 3D space.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The device offers a large 3D workspace, ease of setup, high transparency, and effective gravity compensation, minimizing mechanical constraints and reducing the impact on user movements, while maintaining a cost-effective design.

Implementation Method 1

a capstan transmission for transmitting actuating force from the drive system to the arm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 2

a drive system comprising a plurality of electrical motors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectromagnetic induction: Electromagnetic Induction

Data Source

PatentUS12350215B2Electromechanical robotic manipulandum device
Publication Date: 2025.07.08 UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE
  • US12350215B2 patent drawing
  • US12350215B2 patent drawing
  • US12350215B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An electromechanical manipulandum device can include: a drive system having a plurality of electrical motors; an arm driveable by the drive system and having three degrees-of-freedom of motion; a capstan transmission for transmitting actuating force from the drive system to the arm; an end-effector coupled to the arm, the end-effector configured to engage a user and having at least three degrees-of-freedom of rotational motion; and a control system for controlling the drive system such as to provide a force to the end-effector in a selected direction.