Robotic Map Divergence Detection Using Localized Quality Scores

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic systems face challenges in accurately detecting and correcting diverged computer-readable maps, which can lead to navigation errors and collisions due to sensor imperfections, odometry drift, and feature-poor environments.

Innovation Solution

A method and system for detecting diverged maps using scoring metrics such as footprint score, scan consistency score, and scan alignment score, calculated by a processor to assess map quality and correct errors, involving footprint superimposition, scan simulation, and alignment analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If robotic systems use sensors to collect data during navigation, then map data can be gathered, but sensor imperfections cause map divergence and navigation errors

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemap accuracyVSAvoidsensor imperfections
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by calculating scoring metrics (footprint score, scan consistency score, scan alignment score) that evaluate map quality and provide information about map divergence. This feedback loop enables the robotic system to detect and correct errors in the computer-readable map, thereby improving navigation reliability despite sensor imperfections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces scoring metrics as an intermediary between raw sensor data and the final map representation. These metrics (footprint score, scan consistency score, scan alignment score) act as mediators that evaluate the quality of map data and identify divergences, allowing the system to detect and correct errors without being directly affected by sensor imperfections.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the system calculates multiple scoring metrics to detect map divergence, then detection accuracy improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemap quality assessment accuracyVSAvoidprocessor computation requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the map quality assessment into three distinct scoring metrics: footprint score (evaluating robot position consistency), scan consistency score (evaluating sensor data consistency), and scan alignment score (evaluating map feature alignment). This segmentation allows for comprehensive map divergence detection while organizing computational tasks into manageable, specialized components that can be processed efficiently.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If the system corrects diverged maps using scoring metrics, then navigation accuracy improves, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation accuracyVSAvoidmap correction processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by calculating scoring metrics continuously during navigation to detect map divergence early. By identifying issues before they significantly impact navigation, the system can correct minor divergences more efficiently rather than dealing with accumulated errors, thereby reducing overall processing time while maintaining navigation accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS20240168487A1Systems and methods for detecting and correcting diverged computer readable maps for robotic devices
Publication Date: 2024.05.23 BRAIN CORP
  • US20240168487A1 patent drawing
  • US20240168487A1 patent drawing
  • US20240168487A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for detecting and correcting diverged maps for robotic devices include three scoring metrics that quantify map quality using different methods and properties of the map. The scoring metrics provide localized map quality measurements useful for determining diverged portions of the maps and provide metrics useful for correcting the maps.