Sympathetic Robotic Mounts for Non-Contact Aircraft Assembly

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic manufacturing systems for airplane assembly face inefficiencies and potential damage due to the need for movable tracks to be mounted directly on the fuselage or wings, which is time-consuming and limits access for tasks like painting and cleaning.

Innovation Solution

A robotic manufacturing system with rigid, non-flexible track mounts positioned sympathetically to the underlying item, allowing end effectors to perform tasks like drilling, welding, and painting without direct contact, using jointed members with multiple degrees of freedom to adapt to the item's contour.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If movable tracks are mounted directly on the fuselage or wings, then the robotic system can be flexibly positioned and applied, but the mounting process is time-consuming and causes possible damage to the manufactured item

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility of track positioningVSAvoidtime to set up and disengage the system
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces fixed support structures (stands) as intermediary elements that are positioned near the fuselage rather than directly on it. These stands serve as mediators between the robotic system and the aircraft, providing stable mounting while eliminating direct contact with the manufactured item. The tracks are mounted on these fixed supports rather than directly on the fuselage, resolving the contradiction by maintaining positioning flexibility through adjustable mount mechanisms while avoiding damage and reducing setup time associated with direct mounting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of mounting the tracks directly on the manufactured item (fuselage), the patent inverts the approach by mounting the tracks on fixed support structures that are positioned near the item. This inversion allows the robotic system to maintain adaptability through adjustable mount mechanisms while eliminating the harmful effects of direct mounting. The support structures are placed strategically around the fuselage to provide access without contact, thereby resolving the time-loss contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Ease of operation

If movable tracks are mounted directly on the fuselage, then the robotic system can access the surface for manufacturing tasks, but the surface under the track cannot be accessed for painting and cleaning

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess to surface for manufacturing tasksVSAvoidaccess for painting and cleaning
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the robotic system into multiple independent robotic units, each with its own track and mount mechanism. This segmentation allows different robotic systems to access different areas of the fuselage simultaneously - some positioned for manufacturing tasks like drilling and welding, others positioned for painting and cleaning. The fixed support structures are strategically placed to enable this segmented access, resolving the contradiction by allowing multiple operations on different surface areas without interference.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent transitions from a single-dimension approach (one track directly on the fuselage) to a multi-dimensional arrangement by positioning fixed support structures at various locations around the fuselage (above, below, left, right). This spatial distribution in multiple dimensions allows robotic systems to access different surfaces simultaneously - manufacturing robots can work on areas facing the tracks while painting and cleaning robots access areas underneath or between the support structures, thereby resolving the access contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Adaptability or versatility

If movable tracks are mounted directly on the manufactured item, then the system can be applied to various positions, but disengagement is time-consuming and causes additional possible damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning flexibilityVSAvoidease of disengagement
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The fixed support structures serve as permanent intermediaries that remain in place while the robotic mounts are removed. This eliminates the need for repeated mounting and dismounting of the entire system. The adjustable mount mechanisms allow the robotic units to be easily attached and detached from the fixed supports without causing damage to the fuselage, thereby resolving the contradiction between positioning flexibility and ease of disengagement.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Productivity

If the track is positioned close to the fuselage surface, then the end effectors can perform tasks efficiently, but freshly painted surfaces cannot be engaged immediately causing downtime

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of end effector tasksVSAvoiddowntime for painted surfaces
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the manufacturing process by assigning different robotic systems to different tasks and timeframes. Painting robots operate on freshly painted surfaces when the fuselage is stationary, while manufacturing robots (drilling, welding, etc.) operate when the fuselage is positioned in the assembly hangar with tracks in place. The fixed support structures enable this temporal and functional segmentation, allowing painted surfaces to be processed separately without interfering with manufacturing operations, thereby resolving the downtime contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces dynamic positioning capabilities through adjustable mount mechanisms that can move robotic end effectors closer to or farther from the fuselage surface as needed. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to optimize positioning for different tasks - close positioning for manufacturing tasks requiring precision, and farther positioning when painting operations are underway. The ability to dynamically reposition resolves the contradiction between efficiency and downtime by allowing the system to adapt to different operational phases.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentEP4442579A1System and method for a manufacturing environment with robotic system mounts having one or more end effectors positioned sympathetic to the underlying manufactured item
Publication Date: 2024.10.09 AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH
  • EP4442579A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4442579A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4442579A1 patent drawingFigure 3A

AI summary

A robotic manufacturing system includes a track extending along a length of a component of a partially manufactured item, wherein the component has a non-constant longitudinal shape, the track being supported independently of the partially manufactured item. The system includes a jointed member having an elongated arcuate shape, a mount longitudinally movable along the track and configured to receive the jointed member in an articulating manner, and an end effector movably mounted on the jointed member. The jointed member is movable along a portion of the component length in a radial position sympathetic to the non-constant component longitudinal shape. The jointed member is longitudinally movable relative to the mount along its elongated arcuate shape such that the jointed member will move in an arc spaced from and around an outer component surface. A portion of the end effector is movable along a length of the jointed member.