Robotic Mower Blade Positioning for Boundary Trimming

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous lawn mowers often struggle to efficiently cut grass close to obstacles and boundaries due to their cutting blades being positioned too far from the sidewalls, requiring additional manual trimming and increasing the number of passes needed to cover the work area.

Innovation Solution

The lawn mower can automatically switch between two operating modes, adjusting the cutting blade position relative to the sidewall, allowing for closer cutting to obstacles and boundaries in the second mode, which increases cutting efficiency and reduces the need for manual trimming.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the cutting blades are positioned inboard from the sidewall to minimize contact with foreign objects, then safety and reliability are improved, but the cutting width is reduced and trimming near obstacles becomes difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidcutting width
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting blade assembly is made movable relative to the housing, allowing it to dynamically adjust its position between an inboard position (for safety) and an outboard position (for trimming). The system transitions from a static blade position to a dynamic one, enabling the mower to adapt to different operational requirements such as mowing versus trimming modes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The position of the cutting blade assembly is changed as a variable parameter. By adjusting the distance of the cutting blades from the sidewall, the system can optimize between safety (greater distance) and cutting efficiency (smaller distance). This parameter change allows the same mower to perform both safe mowing and effective trimming operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the cutting blades are positioned inboard from the sidewall to avoid contact with foreign objects, then reliability is improved, but the number of mower passes required to cover the work region increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesafetyVSAvoidnumber of passes
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The movable cutting blade assembly enables the mower to dynamically adjust its cutting position to maximize cutting width during each pass. By positioning the blades closer to the sidewall when appropriate, the mower can cover more ground per pass, reducing the total number of passes needed to complete the work region.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the blade-to-sidewall distance parameter to optimize cutting width. By increasing the cutting width through parameter adjustment, the mower reduces the number of passes required, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining safety through controlled operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the cutting blades are positioned closer to the sidewall to increase cutting width, then productivity is improved, but the risk of contact with foreign objects increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting widthVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting blade assembly is made dynamically adjustable, allowing the operator to position the blades closer to the sidewall only when needed for trimming operations. During normal mowing, the blades remain in the safer inboard position. This dynamic adjustment enables the system to achieve high productivity when necessary while maintaining safety during routine operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The blade position parameter is changed based on operational requirements. The system allows the cutting width parameter to be increased by moving blades closer to the sidewall, but only when the operational context (such as trimming mode) justifies the increased risk. This conditional parameter change balances productivity gains with safety considerations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Ease of operation

If the cutting blades are positioned closer to the sidewall to enable trimming near obstacles, then ease of operation is improved, but the risk of contact with foreign objects increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetrimming capabilityVSAvoidsafety
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The movable cutting blade assembly provides the ease of operation needed for trimming by allowing the blades to be positioned close to the sidewall and obstacles. The system becomes adaptable to different operational modes, making trimming near boundaries and obstacles straightforward while maintaining safety through controlled, mode-specific operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The blade position parameter is adjusted to enable effective trimming operations. By changing the distance parameter between the cutting blades and sidewall, the system achieves the ease of operation required for trimming while managing safety risks through appropriate mode selection and operator control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS20230270044A1Robotic mower having multiple operating modes
Publication Date: 2023.08.31 THE TORO COMPANY
  • US20230270044A1 patent drawing
  • US20230270044A1 patent drawing
  • US20230270044A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Apparatus, systems, and methods for operating an autonomous vehicle. In some embodiments, the vehicle is embodied as a mower having a downwardly extending sidewall and a cutting blade assembly. The cutting blade assembly is adapted to cut grass along a path defining a proximal cut edge located at a first distance from the sidewall when the mower is configured in a first operating mode, and at a second distance from the sidewall when the mower is configured in a second operating mode. The mower is adapted to automatically switch from the first operating mode to the second operating mode when an electronic controller associated with the mower determines a local area of operation of the mower is free of unknown objects.