Robotic Object Detection With Minimum Viable Region Registration

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robotic systems face challenges in efficiently and accurately detecting and handling unknown or unrecognized objects, leading to potential mishandling and increased operational disruptions, especially when objects are heavy or irregularly shaped, as they rely on pre-registered data and may fail to correctly identify physical characteristics.

Innovation Solution

A robotic system equipped with autonomous object detection and registration mechanisms that utilize image processing and sensor data to identify exposed edges and corners of unrecognized objects, derive minimum viable regions for gripping, and update registration data autonomously, allowing for the registration and handling of previously unknown objects without human intervention.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the robotic system relies on pre-registered data for object detection, then the system complexity is reduced and operation is simpler, but the system fails to correctly identify physical characteristics of unrecognized objects leading to mishandling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobject detection accuracyVSAvoidhandling of unrecognized objects
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by capturing images of objects before handling operations. The imaging device captures images of the stack of packages, and the system processes these images to identify physical characteristics such as dimensions, weight, and center of mass. This preliminary detection allows the robotic system to adapt to unrecognized objects by establishing their characteristics before manipulation occurs.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms by comparing captured images with registered images stored in a registration data source. When mismatches are detected, the system uses this feedback to trigger manual registration or to identify that an object is unrecognized, thereby adjusting its handling approach. The feedback loop ensures continuous improvement of detection accuracy for both recognized and unrecognized objects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If manual registration of packages is performed, then detection accuracy for unrecognized objects is improved, but operational time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical characteristics identificationVSAvoidde-palletizing speed
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system performs self-service by autonomously detecting and registering objects without requiring constant manual intervention. The system captures images, processes them to identify physical characteristics, and updates registration data automatically. This self-service capability reduces the need for manual registration while maintaining high detection accuracy, thereby preserving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical registration with automated image processing and computer vision techniques. Instead of relying on human workers to physically measure and register objects, the imaging device captures visual data, and the system automatically extracts physical characteristics such as dimensions, weight, and center of mass through image analysis algorithms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Speed

If the robotic arm handles heavy or lop-sided packages without accurate detection, then operational speed is maintained, but the risk of mishandling and bodily injuries increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandling speedVSAvoidsafe handling of heavy objects
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary detection of physical characteristics including weight and center of mass before the robotic arm grasps and moves heavy packages. By identifying these characteristics in advance through image processing, the system can plan appropriate gripping strategies and motion paths, ensuring safe handling of heavy or lop-sided objects while maintaining operational speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses feedback from image processing to continuously monitor and adjust handling parameters for heavy objects. When objects are detected as heavy or having unusual center of mass distribution, the feedback triggers adjustments in gripping force, arm positioning, and motion control to prevent mishandling while maintaining efficient operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11176674B2Robotic system with automated object detection mechanism and methods of operating the same
Publication Date: 2021.11.16 MUJIN INC
  • US11176674B2 patent drawing
  • US11176674B2 patent drawing
  • US11176674B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for operating a robotic system to register unrecognized objects is disclosed. The robotic system may use first image data representative of an unrecognized object located at a start location to derive an initial minimum viable region (MVR) and to implement operations for initially displacing the unrecognized object. The robotic system may analyze second image data representative of the unrecognized object after the initial displacement operations to detect a condition representative of an accuracy of the initial MVR. The robotic system may register the initial MVR or an adjustment thereof based on the detected condition.