Robotic Pin Placement for Knee Arthroplasty Alignment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current cutting guide systems for total knee arthroplasty are complex and time-consuming to align, requiring extensive user training and often result in malalignment due to anatomical variations and the need for precise manual adjustments, which can lead to suboptimal outcomes and increased revision surgery rates.

Innovation Solution

A surgical alignment system using bone pins inserted into virtual planes defined by planning software, with a cutting guide configured to clamp onto these pins, allowing for precise alignment and reduction of manual adjustment burdens through a 2-DOF surgical system with fiducial markers for tracking and real-time adjustment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If manual adjustment mechanisms are used to align cutting guides, then the cutting guide can be positioned on the bone, but the complexity of the system increases and extensive user training is required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment of cutting guideVSAvoidmanual adjustment mechanisms
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical adjustment mechanisms with a robotic system that uses computer vision and automated control to position the cutting guide. The robotic arm with fiducial markers provides automated alignment without requiring complex manual adjustments, thereby reducing device complexity while maintaining ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses image-guidance and computer vision to create a virtual model of the bone anatomy, allowing the system to plan and execute cutting guide alignment based on digital copies of the anatomical structures. This eliminates the need for complex physical adjustment mechanisms while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Measurement precision

If passive navigation or image-guidance is used to orient cutting guides, then alignment can be achieved, but the surgeon must constantly reference a monitor introducing error and prolonging the procedure

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment accuracyVSAvoidprocedure duration
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system performs self-alignment using automated computer vision and fiducial marker tracking. The system independently calculates and executes the positioning of the cutting guide without requiring the surgeon to constantly reference external monitors, thereby reducing procedure time while maintaining alignment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses real-time feedback from fiducial markers and image-guidance to continuously monitor and adjust the cutting guide position. This closed-loop control ensures accurate alignment while automating the process, eliminating the need for manual monitoring and reducing procedure time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If anatomical landmark referencing is used to align cutting guides, then positioning can be achieved, but anatomical variations cause difficulty in accurate alignment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting guide positioningVSAvoidalignment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the reference parameters from anatomical landmarks to fiducial markers with known geometric properties. These artificial markers provide consistent, measurable reference points that are not affected by anatomical variations, thereby maintaining alignment accuracy across different patients while simplifying the positioning process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates a digital model of the patient's anatomy and uses fiducial markers as reference points in this virtual model. This allows for precise planning and execution of cutting guide alignment that is independent of anatomical variations, improving both ease of operation and alignment accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

4Measurement precision

If a robotic system with fiducial markers is used for pin insertion, then real-time tracking and alignment can be achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepin placement accuracyVSAvoidrobotic system with tracking
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system with fiducial markers serves multiple functions: it provides real-time tracking of the cutting guide position, enables computer vision-based alignment, and facilitates automated pin insertion. By consolidating these functions into a single system, the patent reduces overall device complexity while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12082893B2Robotic pin placement
Publication Date: 2024.09.10 THINK SURGICAL INC
  • US12082893B2 patent drawing
  • US12082893B2 patent drawing
  • US12082893B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for creating cuts on a bone are provided utilizing one or more cutting guides assembled to a plurality of bone pins, where the bone pins are inserted on the bone coincident with one or more virtual pin planes defined relative to one or more of the cuts. Alignment guides are also disclosed herein that aid in the creation of pilot holes for receiving a cutting block in a desired position and orientation (POSE). An articulating surgical device actively positions the bone pins coincident with the virtual plane to ensure the cutting guides, when assembled to the pins, aligns one or more guide slots in the desired POSE to create the cuts.