Robotic Placement Sequencing for Adaptive Multi-Location Stacking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic systems lack the sophistication and adaptability to perform complex tasks with the granularity and flexibility required for intricate operations, often failing to efficiently utilize resources and adapt to real-world conditions due to limitations in control and flexibility.

Innovation Solution

A robotic system with a multi-location placement control mechanism that dynamically adjusts stacking height limits and motion plans based on real-time sensor data and object characteristics, sequencing placement areas to optimize stacking efficiency and reduce collision likelihoods, while accounting for unexpected conditions such as deformed or misaligned objects.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If robots execute tasks automatically to replace human involvement, then productivity increases, but adaptability and sophistication decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation efficiencyVSAvoidadaptability to real-world conditions
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system employs sensors to continuously monitor object characteristics, placement conditions, and robot performance, feeding this information back to the control system which dynamically adjusts motion plans and placement strategies. This closed-loop feedback mechanism enables the robotic system to adapt to varying real-world conditions while maintaining high automation efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically generates and adjusts motion plans based on real-time sensor data and changing conditions. Rather than following fixed predetermined paths, the system adapts its motion parameters, placement sequences, and stacking strategies dynamically, enabling both high productivity and adaptability to unexpected conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If robots follow fixed motion plans for object placement, then operational simplicity increases, but flexibility and resource utilization decrease

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemotion plan simplicityVSAvoidflexibility in executed actions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary analysis of the task environment, object characteristics, and placement requirements to generate initial motion plans and stacking strategies. This preliminary action enables the system to anticipate potential issues and prepare adaptive responses, maintaining operational simplicity while enabling flexibility when deviations from the plan become necessary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The control system dynamically modifies motion plan parameters such as velocity, acceleration, positioning accuracy, and placement sequences based on real-time conditions. By changing these parameters adaptively, the system maintains simple overall operational structure while achieving flexible responses to varying task requirements and unexpected conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If robots place objects without considering stacking height limits, then placement speed increases, but system reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveplacement speedVSAvoidstacking safety and stability
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary calculation of stacking height limits and safe placement zones before executing object placement. By pre-determining acceptable placement parameters based on object characteristics and target location, the system can place objects at high speed while ensuring stacking safety, as the reliability constraints are already established in advance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors current stack heights and compares them against calculated limits, using this feedback to adjust placement decisions in real-time. This enables the robot to maintain high placement speed while automatically preventing violations of stacking safety constraints through real-time monitoring and adaptive decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS20240173866A1Robotic system with multi-location placement control mechanism
Publication Date: 2024.05.30 MUJIN INC
  • US20240173866A1 patent drawing
  • US20240173866A1 patent drawing
  • US20240173866A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system and method for operating a robotic system to place objects on multiple placement locations on a given surface. The robotic system may use a sequence for such placement locations to control the placement of objects onto the placement locations.