Robotic Plasma Cutting Path Planning With Dynamic Cut Chart Selection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for planning processing paths in three-dimensional environments for robotic plasma arc cutting systems are inefficient and prone to errors due to the manual selection of consumables and parameter settings, which complicates the design process and impacts system efficiency and cut results.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that automatically determines a processing path by receiving CAD data and user parameters, dynamically filters a library of cut charts, and generates a path considering plasma arc dynamics and robotic capabilities, selecting suitable consumables and their settings to optimize the cutting process.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual selection of consumables and parameter settings is used for path planning, then flexibility in adjusting design choices is improved, but time consumption and error rate increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in adjusting design choicesVSAvoidtime consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-service through the path planning module that automatically selects consumables, determines parameter settings, and generates processing paths without manual intervention. The module autonomously manages the entire workflow from CAD data import to G-code generation, eliminating the need for operators to manually adjust each parameter while maintaining design flexibility through configurable constraints and preferences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of parameter adjustment and consumable selection with an automated computational system. The path planning module uses algorithms to automatically determine optimal parameters, substitute manual decision-making with computer-based optimization, and replace physical manual operations with automated software-driven path generation and system configuration.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual management of consumables library is performed, then customization of processing parameters is improved, but complexity and error-proneness of the process increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecustomization of processing parametersVSAvoidcomplexity of consumables management
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The path planning module serves as an intermediary between the operator and the complex consumables library. It automatically manages the library of consumables and parameter settings, translating high-level processing requirements into specific consumable selections and parameter configurations. This intermediary layer shields users from the underlying complexity while maintaining full customization capabilities through configurable parameters and constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements a universal path planning module that handles multiple functions including consumable selection, parameter optimization, collision detection, and path generation within a single integrated system. This multi-functional approach consolidates what would otherwise require multiple separate tools and manual processes, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining versatility across different processing scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If automated path planning is implemented, then processing efficiency is improved, but plasma arc dynamics compensation becomes more challenging

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidcomplexity of plasma arc dynamics compensation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary compensation for plasma arc dynamics during the path planning stage rather than requiring real-time adjustments during execution. The path planning module pre-calculates compensation values for arc wander, heat input effects, and other plasma-specific phenomena, embedding these corrections directly into the generated processing path. This preliminary action approach maintains high processing efficiency while managing the complexity of plasma arc dynamics through advance preparation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Manufacturing precision

If multiple cuts with different parameters are required for complex parts, then processing precision is improved, but management burden increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing precisionVSAvoidmanagement burden
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The path planning module automatically segments complex parts into multiple cutting operations when required, dividing the overall processing task into discrete passes with optimized parameters for each. It intelligently identifies when multiple cuts are necessary based on part geometry, material thickness, and tool capabilities, then automatically generates the sequence of operations with appropriate parameter changes for each segment, eliminating the need for manual management of multiple cutting passes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method enhances efficiency and accuracy in processing three-dimensional workpieces by automating consumable selection and path planning, ensuring precise and optimized cuts while minimizing errors and collisions.

Implementation Method 1

a plasma arc cutting system coupled to a robotic arm

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma arc: Plasma

Implementation Method 2

plasma arc cutting system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectric arc: Electric Arc

Data Source

PatentUS20250229421A1Integration of plasma processing and robotic path planning
Publication Date: 2025.07.17 HYPERTHERM INC
  • US20250229421A1 patent drawing
  • US20250229421A1 patent drawing
  • US20250229421A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention features a computer-implemented method of planning a processing path relative to a three-dimensional workpiece for a plasma arc cutting system coupled to a robotic arm. The method includes receiving input data from a user comprising (i) Computer-Aided Design (CAD) data for specifying a desired part to be processed from the three-dimensional workpiece, and (ii) one or more desired parameters for operating the plasma arc cutting system. A plurality of features of the desired part to be formed on the three-dimensional workpiece are identified based on the CAD data. The method also includes dynamically filtering a library of cut charts based on the plurality of features and the desired operating parameters to determine a recommended cut chart for processing the plurality of features. The method further includes generating the processing path based on the recommended cut chart and the plurality of features to be formed.