Robotic Sanding Tool with Real-Time Force Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current sanding technologies, both manual and automated, face challenges in achieving a consistent material removal rate, especially on surfaces with variable geometries, leading to inconsistent results and increased risk of operator injury in manual sanding and high processing costs in automated systems.

Innovation Solution

A system comprising a sanding tool with a robotic manipulator and a control unit that monitors and adjusts sanding parameters in real-time to maintain a consistent material removal rate by moving the sanding tool to a sanding position with a normal force, setting parameters based on a model rate, and modifying them to achieve an actual rate matching the model rate.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If automated robotic sanding is used, then productivity and consistency are improved, but the system cannot identify required sanding degree at particular locations and requires extensive numerical control programming for different surface geometries

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesanding speedVSAvoidprogramming complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes parameters dynamically by using sensors to detect surface geometry and sanding requirements in real-time, then adjusts sanding parameters (speed, pressure, abrasive selection) accordingly. This eliminates the need for extensive pre-programming while maintaining automated productivity and consistency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic sanding system performs self-adjustment by using its own sensors to detect surface characteristics and automatically modifying sanding parameters. The system serves itself by identifying required sanding degree at particular locations through real-time sensing, eliminating the need for external programming for different geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Adaptability or versatility

If manual sanding is used, then adaptability to different surface geometries and locations is improved, but operator safety deteriorates due to repetitive motion injury risk

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to surface geometryVSAvoidoperator injury risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical sanding system with an automated robotic system that uses sensors and controlled mechanisms to perform sanding operations. This substitution eliminates operator exposure to repetitive motion injuries while maintaining adaptability through real-time surface detection and parameter adjustment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system acts as an intermediary between the operator and the sanding process. The operator programs the system once, and the robot executes the sanding operations, mediating the harmful repetitive motion exposure while preserving the ability to handle different surface geometries through sensor feedback.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Loss of time

If automated sanding is used, then processing time is reduced, but material removal rate consistency deteriorates without real-time parameter adjustment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing timeVSAvoidmaterial removal rate consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback control by using sensors to monitor surface characteristics and sanding progress in real-time, then adjusting sanding parameters accordingly. This feedback loop maintains consistent material removal rate while keeping processing time short, as the system automatically adapts without requiring manual intervention or reprogramming.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures a consistent material removal depth and surface characteristics across varying surface geometries, improving the quality and accuracy of the sanding process while reducing operator risk and processing time.

Implementation Method 1

a robotic manipulator coupled to the sanding tool and configured to move the sanding tool relative to the structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical Force: Mechanical Force

Implementation Method 2

a sanding tool including an abrasive surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbrasion: Abrasion

Implementation Method 3

the abrasive surface is in contact with the surface and a sanding force is approximately normal to the surface

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Implementation Method 4

monitor one or more of the sanding parameters when the sanding tool is in the sanding position; determine an actual material removal rate, based on one or more of the sanding parameters being monitored

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectForce sensing: Force

Data Source

PatentUS11633832B2Systems and methods for sanding a surface of a structure
Publication Date: 2023.04.25 THE BOEING CO
  • US11633832B2 patent drawing
  • US11633832B2 patent drawing
  • US11633832B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system for sanding a surface includes a sanding tool, a robotic manipulator to move the sanding tool relative to the surface, and a control unit operatively coupled with the sanding tool and the robotic manipulator. The control unit is operable to: (1) move the sanding tool to a sanding position relative to the surface in which an abrasive surface is in contact with the surface and a sanding force is approximately normal to the surface; (2) set one or more sanding parameters corresponding to a model material removal rate; (3) monitor one or more of the sanding parameters; (4) determine an actual material removal rate, based on one or more of the sanding parameters being monitored; and (5) modify one or more of the sanding parameters until the actual material removal rate is approximately equal to the model material removal rate.