Robotic Skill Templates for Distributed Demonstration Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional robotic control methods, such as reinforcement learning, face challenges with complex high-dimensional action spaces, sparse rewards, and brittleness, making them computationally expensive and difficult to scale and generalize across different environments and robots.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of demonstration-based robotic learning, which uses customized control policies learned from skill templates and demonstration data, incorporating visual, proprioceptive, and haptic data to adapt rapidly to various robot models with high precision, allowing for rapid training by non-experts and widespread application across different robots.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If traditional reinforcement learning is used for robotic control, then robots can learn tasks autonomously, but the computational cost becomes extremely expensive and the process is difficult to scale

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous task learningVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a demonstration data collector as an intermediary that captures pre-labeled state-action pairs from human operators or pre-programmed sequences. This mediator provides the reinforcement learning algorithm with structured training data, reducing the computational burden of exploring the entire action space from scratch while still enabling autonomous learning capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary actions by collecting demonstration data beforehand, which includes pre-labeled state-action pairs that capture expert behavior. This preliminary data collection phase reduces the subsequent computational cost by providing a head start to the reinforcement learning algorithm, eliminating the need to learn basic task structures during expensive online training.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Adaptability or versatility

If reinforcement learning is used for robotic control, then robots can adapt to tasks, but the reward signal is extremely sparse making learning inefficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask adaptation capabilityVSAvoidlearning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dense feedback mechanisms by providing the reinforcement learning algorithm with intermediate reward signals based on progress toward the goal state. Instead of waiting for sparse terminal rewards, the system provides continuous feedback about task completion progress, sub-goal achievement, and deviation from demonstrated trajectories, dramatically accelerating learning convergence.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The demonstration data acts as an intermediary that provides implicit reward information through pre-labeled successful trajectories. By learning from these demonstrated examples, the robot receives indirect feedback about which actions lead to successful task completion, compensating for the sparsity of explicit reward signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If traditional reinforcement learning models are trained, then robots can perform specific tasks, but even tiny changes to the task, robot, or environment cause the model to become completely unusable

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution precisionVSAvoidrobustness to changes
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation mechanisms that allow the reinforcement learning model to adjust to changes in real-time. The system continuously monitors task parameters, robot state, and environmental conditions, dynamically modifying the policy or retraining with new demonstration data when changes are detected, thereby maintaining task execution precision across varying conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system develops universal policies through demonstration data collection that captures a wide variety of task variations, robot configurations, and environmental conditions. By training on diverse demonstrated trajectories, the robot learns a multi-functional policy that can handle multiple task variants and adapt to changes without complete retraining, enhancing robustness while maintaining precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Manufacturing precision

If manual programming is used for robotic control, then precise task execution can be achieved, but the process is tedious, time-consuming, and error-prone

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution precisionVSAvoidprogramming time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service mechanisms where the robot automatically collects demonstration data during normal operation and uses this data to refine its own control policies through reinforcement learning. This self-learning capability eliminates the need for tedious manual programming while maintaining high task execution precision, as the robot improves its performance autonomously over time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by capturing human expert demonstrations and replicating their behavior through state-action pair collection. Instead of manually programming each control action, the system copies expert performance patterns from demonstration data, automatically translating observed behaviors into executable policies that achieve precise task execution without manual programming effort.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Data Source

PatentUS11679497B2Distributed robotic demonstration learning
Publication Date: 2023.06.20 INTRINSIC INNOVATION LLC
  • US11679497B2 patent drawing
  • US11679497B2 patent drawing
  • US11679497B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for distributed robotic demonstration learning. One of the methods includes receiving a skill template to be trained to cause a robot to perform a particular skill having a plurality of subtasks. One or more demonstration subtasks defined by the skill template are identified, wherein each demonstration subtask is an action to be refined using local demonstration data. On online execution system uploads sets of local demonstration data to a cloud-based training system. The cloud-based training system generates respective trained model parameters for each set of local demonstration data. The skill template is executed on the robot using the trained model parameters generated by the cloud-based training system.