Robotic Skill Templates for Fast Demonstration-Based Task Learning

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Traditional robotic control methods, such as reinforcement learning, face challenges with complex high-dimensional action spaces, sparse rewards, and brittleness, making them computationally expensive and difficult to scale and generalize across different environments and robots.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of demonstration-based robotic learning, which uses local demonstration data to generate customized control policies for robots, allowing for rapid adaptation to specific robot models and environments, and enabling the use of visual, proprioceptive, and haptic data to perform tasks with high precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Extent of automation

If traditional reinforcement learning is used for robotic control, then robots can learn tasks through trial and error, but the computational cost becomes extremely expensive due to complex high-dimensional action spaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous task learningVSAvoidcomputational resources
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-collecting demonstration data from human operators or expert demonstrations before actual robot execution. This pre-collected data serves as prior knowledge that guides the robot's learning process, eliminating the need for expensive trial-and-error exploration in high-dimensional action spaces. The demonstration data includes state-action pairs that directly show the robot how to perform tasks, significantly reducing computational requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses copying by creating a model or representation of expert behavior from demonstration data. Instead of learning from scratch through expensive reinforcement learning, the robot copies the demonstrated actions and patterns from the collected data. This copying approach allows the robot to replicate expert performance without undergoing the computationally intensive learning process that traditional reinforcement learning would require.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Adaptability or versatility

If traditional reinforcement learning is used for robotic control, then robots can adapt to tasks, but the training time becomes excessively long due to sparse rewards

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask adaptationVSAvoidtraining time
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements feedback by using the collected demonstration data to provide direct guidance to the robot's learning process. Instead of relying on sparse rewards that only indicate final task completion, the demonstration data provides dense feedback at every step, showing the robot what actions lead to successful outcomes. This feedback mechanism accelerates learning by continuously guiding the robot toward correct behaviors rather than requiring lengthy trial-and-error processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-collecting demonstration data that encapsulates successful task execution strategies. This pre-collected knowledge serves as a head start for the robot, eliminating the need to rediscover successful behaviors through time-consuming trial and error. The robot begins with prior knowledge of effective actions, dramatically reducing training time while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Productivity

If traditional reinforcement learning is used for robotic control, then robots can learn optimal policies, but the models become extremely brittle and unusable with tiny changes to the task or environment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution efficiencyVSAvoidmodel robustness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies universality by collecting demonstration data that covers a wide variety of scenarios, task variations, and environmental conditions. Instead of training on narrow, task-specific data that leads to brittle models, the demonstration data is designed to be universally applicable across multiple task variants. This allows the robot to learn robust policies that generalize to unseen situations and adapt to small changes in the task or environment without becoming unusable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter changes by varying the parameters of demonstrated tasks during data collection, such as different object positions, orientations, speeds, and environmental conditions. This exposes the learning system to a broad range of parameter variations, enabling it to learn invariant features and robust policies that remain effective when parameters change slightly. The robot learns to handle parameter variations gracefully, improving reliability while maintaining productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Manufacturing precision

If manual programming is used for robotic control, then precise task execution can be achieved, but the programming process is tedious and cannot be easily transferred to other workcells

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetask execution precisionVSAvoidprogramming ease
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses copying by capturing demonstration data from human operators performing tasks, which automatically encodes the precise movements and decisions needed for task execution. Instead of manually programming each movement, the system copies the expert's natural behavior through data collection. This copied knowledge maintains the precision of expert performance while eliminating the tedium of manual programming, and can be easily transferred to other workcells by reusing or adapting the demonstrated policies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies universality by creating demonstration-based policies that can be transferred across different workcells and robot configurations. The collected demonstration data captures fundamental task skills that are applicable in multiple contexts, allowing the same learned policies to be reused across different environments with minimal adaptation. This eliminates the need for separate manual programming for each workcell while maintaining precise task execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11986958B2Skill templates for robotic demonstration learning
Publication Date: 2024.05.21 INTRINSIC INNOVATION LLC
  • US11986958B2 patent drawing
  • US11986958B2 patent drawing
  • US11986958B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for using skill templates for robotic demonstration learning. One of the methods includes receiving a skill template for a task to be performed by a robot, wherein the skill template defines a state machine having a plurality of subtasks and one or more respective transition conditions between one or more of the subtasks. Local demonstration data for a demonstration subtask of the skill template is received, where the local demonstration data is generated from a user demonstrating how to perform the demonstration subtask with the robot. A machine learning model is refined for the demonstration subtask and the skill template is executed on the robot, causing the robot to transition through the state machine defined by the skill template to perform the task.