Robotic Soil Cultivation Using Traction Threshold Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic vehicles for soil cultivation face inefficiencies and damage due to changing environmental conditions, such as traction losses from water or dry soil, leading to unsatisfactory or degraded work area states during operations like mowing or aerification.

Innovation Solution

A robotic vehicle system that measures traction values across a work area and only performs soil cultivation when the measured traction exceeds a minimum threshold, using sensors and algorithms to prevent operations in conditions that could result in slipping or tool damage, and adjusts movement trajectories based on soil moisture and slope.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the robotic vehicle performs soil cultivation operations continuously regardless of environmental conditions, then productivity is maintained, but the work area may be degraded and operation efficiency decreases due to wheel slip and tool damage

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation continuityVSAvoidwork area quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors traction conditions through sensors and feeds this information back to the control unit, which automatically adjusts or suspends operations based on real-time traction threshold comparisons, resolving the contradiction between continuous operation and work area protection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adapts operational status based on changing environmental conditions by comparing real-time traction measurements against thresholds, allowing the vehicle to transition between operating and suspended states to maintain both productivity and work area quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Productivity

If the robotic vehicle operates on wet or slippery surfaces, then productivity is maintained, but energy consumption increases and wheel slip damages the work area

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation continuityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit receives real-time traction feedback from sensors and automatically suspends operations when traction thresholds are not met, preventing excessive energy consumption from wheel spin and slip while protecting the work area

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Productivity

If the robotic vehicle performs soil cultivation in all weather conditions, then productivity is maximized, but the accuracy and quality of cultivation deteriorates due to changing traction conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperation frequencyVSAvoidcultivation accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses real-time traction feedback to determine appropriate operating conditions, suspending operations when traction conditions fall below thresholds, thereby ensuring cultivation accuracy is maintained while optimizing productivity through condition-based operation scheduling

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentEP3695700B1Robotic vehicle for movable operation in a work area
Publication Date: 2024.11.06 STIGA S P A IN BREVE ANCHE ST SPA
  • EP3695700B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3695700B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3695700B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to a robotic vehicle (100) for a movable operation in a work area (108), the movable operation comprising a soil cultivation. The vehicle (100) comprises a controller (118) with a memory (122) and a processor (120). The memory (122) comprising instructions (124), execution of which causes the vehicle (100) to measure a traction value. The traction value represents a local traction of one or more drive wheels (1500) of the robotic vehicle (100) within at least a subarea (1206; 1208) of the work area (108). The measured traction value is compared with a first predefined traction threshold defining a minimum traction value for the subarea (1206; 1208) of the work area (108) and, in case the measured traction value exceeds the minimum traction value, the movable operation with the soil cultivation is performed in the subarea (1206; 1208) of the work area (108) following a scheduled movement trajectory (1200; 1202) covering the subarea (1206; 1208).