Adaptive Robotic Stone Surfacing for Irregular Surface Finishing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The complexity of stonework automation is hindered by unpredictable material behavior, necessitating skilled craftsmen for custom tasks due to the inability of current robotic systems to adapt to the unpredictable nature of stone surfaces.

Innovation Solution

An adaptive robotic system equipped with a stone-working end effector, comprising a bracket, tool holder, driving element, and guiding element, which allows for real-time material feedback and iterative fabrication processes to emulate human decision-making, enabling precise stone surfacing and handling of irregular surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If traditional manual stonework methods are used, then skilled craftsmen can handle unpredictable material behavior, but labor costs increase and automation is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveability to handle unpredictable material behaviorVSAvoidautomation level
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates sensors that provide real-time feedback on stone surface conditions, tool depth, and cutting forces. This feedback loop enables the robotic system to detect unpredictable material behavior and automatically adjust cutting parameters, replacing the adaptive decision-making previously performed by skilled craftsmen while maintaining full automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system dynamically adjusts cutting parameters such as feed rate, depth of cut, and tool path based on real-time sensor data. This dynamic adaptability allows the system to respond to unpredictable variations in stone properties during the cutting process, achieving both automation and the ability to handle material unpredictability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Extent of automation

If robotic automation is implemented without adaptive capabilities, then automation level increases, but manufacturing precision decreases due to inability to adapt to irregular surfaces

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautomation levelVSAvoidsurface finishing quality
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

Sensors continuously monitor the actual cutting conditions and surface geometry, providing real-time feedback that enables the robotic system to adjust its tool path and cutting parameters. This closed-loop control maintains manufacturing precision on irregular surfaces while preserving full automation, eliminating the trade-off between automation and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically changes cutting parameters such as feed rate, depth of cut, and tool orientation based on real-time sensor measurements of surface irregularities. This dynamic parameter adjustment enables the robotic system to maintain high manufacturing precision on non-planar surfaces without sacrificing automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Adaptability or versatility

If complex adaptive control systems are added to handle unpredictable stone behavior, then adaptability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to material behaviorVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system replaces complex mechanical adaptive mechanisms with sensor-based detection and software-based control algorithms. Instead of using complex mechanical systems to physically adapt to material variations, the invention uses electronic sensors and computational processing to detect and respond to unpredictable stone behavior, reducing mechanical complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system achieves consistent and repeatable results on non-planar stone surfaces, enhancing automation in stonework by integrating real-time sensory feedback and iterative fabrication protocols, reducing reliance on skilled labor.

Implementation Method 1

a guiding element for changeably receiving a body portion of the tool and for guiding the tool in the axial direction, wherein the guiding element is configured to resiliently return the tool proximally along the axial direction after the power stroke

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElasticity: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS12397472B2Device and method for adaptive robotic stone surfacing
Publication Date: 2025.08.26 TECHNION RES & DEV FOUND LTD
  • US12397472B2 patent drawing
  • US12397472B2 patent drawing
  • US12397472B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A device comprising: a bracket adapted to be coupled to a distal end of a robotic arm; a tool holder coupled to said bracket and configured for changeably receiving a first portion of a stone working tool, wherein said tool is movable in a reciprocating axial direction; a driving element for driving said tool distally along said axial direction during a power stroke of said device; and a guiding element for changeably receiving a body portion of said tool and for guiding said tool in said axial direction, wherein said guiding element is configured to resiliently return said tool proximally along said axial direction after said power stroke.