Laparoscopic Applicator for Robotic Surgery Dispensing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robotic-assisted surgery systems lack precision and control in dispensing medical substances, such as haemostatics, due to limited haptic feedback and reliance on human assistants for inserting and activating applicators, which can lead to inaccurate and unreliable substance delivery.

Innovation Solution

A laparoscopic applicator designed for robotic arm manipulation, featuring a deformable and rigid section for precise spatial control, with an actuator for controlled substance release, allowing direct robotic arm interaction and feedback mechanisms for enhanced safety and accuracy.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a manually operated syringe is used for dispensing haemostatic paste, then the surgeon can directly control the dispensing, but the target site is not directly accessible in minimally invasive procedures

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveDirect surgical controlVSAvoidApplicator tube length
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSLength of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The applicator system is divided into two functional segments: a robotic arm for precise positioning and manipulation of the applicator tip, and a control unit for dispensing the haemostatic paste. This segmentation allows the robotic arm to reach inaccessible target sites while maintaining precise control over paste dispensing through the control unit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The applicator tube serves as an intermediary element between the robotic arm and the target site. It is prefilled with haemostatic paste and designed to be inserted via a trocar port, allowing the robotic arm to deliver the paste to inaccessible locations without requiring direct manual manipulation at the surgical site.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Length of moving object

If an elongated applicator tube is introduced via trocar port for minimally invasive procedures, then the target site becomes accessible, but the insertion and dispensing process is not visible to the surgeon

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveApplicator tube lengthVSAvoidSurgeon visibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual mechanical insertion and control with an automated robotic system. The robotic arm performs the insertion and positioning functions that were previously manual, while the control unit automates the paste dispensing process, eliminating the need for the surgeon to directly observe and manually control these operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The control unit provides feedback to the robotic arm about the status of the applicator tube and paste dispensing. This allows the robotic system to monitor and adjust its operations without requiring the surgeon to directly observe the insertion and dispensing processes, maintaining situational awareness through electronic feedback rather than visual observation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If the applicator is controlled by a robotic arm, then precision and accuracy are improved, but haptic feedback and intuitive control are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovePositioning precisionVSAvoidHaptic feedback
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The control unit acts as an intermediary between the robotic arm and the surgical environment. It processes inputs from the robotic arm, manages the paste dispensing timing and amount, and coordinates the overall operation. This intermediary layer allows the robotic arm to provide precise positioning while the control unit handles the haptic and control aspects that are difficult to transmit through the robotic interface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Length of moving object

If paste is dispensed through a prefilled applicator tube, then minimally invasive access is achieved, but control over the dispensing process is lost to the assistant

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveApplicator tube lengthVSAvoidDispensing control
Core Design Contradiction:
Length of moving objectVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical dispensing control with an automated control unit that manages the paste dispensing process. The control unit receives signals from the robotic arm and automatically controls when and how much paste is dispensed, eliminating the need for the assistant to manually control the dispensing process while maintaining precise automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240315682A1Applicator for robot-assisted surgery
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 FERROSAN MEDICAL DEVICES
  • US20240315682A1 patent drawing
  • US20240315682A1 patent drawing
  • US20240315682A1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present disclosure relates to a laparoscopic applicator for dispensing a substance, e.g. a substance comprising a haemostatic agent, at a selected site by means of a surgical robotic arm, the laparoscopic applicator comprising a delivery tube configured for holding the substance under a pressure; and an applicator tip connected to a distal end of the delivery tube, wherein the applicator tip is configured for being controllable operated by the robotic arm by being spatially manipulated by the robotic arm, and controllably releasing the substance from the delivery tube by the robotic arm.