Robotic Surgery Handoff Control Between AI Autonomy and Surgeon Judgment

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional surgical systems are complex to operate and unable to replace the role of a surgeon, leading to inefficiencies and increased risk of adverse events during surgery.

Innovation Solution

A robotic surgical system that is controlled jointly by an artificial intelligence (AI) and a surgeon, allowing for autonomous operation and seamless handoff for manual control, thereby reducing human error and fatigue.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a robotic surgical system is fully autonomous, then surgical precision and reduction of human error are improved, but the ability to handle unexpected situations and surgical judgment deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical precisionVSAvoidsurgical judgment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically transitions between autonomous and manual control modes based on surgical conditions. The robotic system operates autonomously during routine precise tasks, then dynamically hands off control to the surgeon when adaptability or surgical judgment are needed, creating a flexible hybrid control architecture that optimizes both precision and adaptability throughout the procedure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional surgical methods are used, then surgical judgment and adaptability are maintained, but surgeon fatigue and human error increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical judgmentVSAvoidhuman error
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The surgical procedure is segmented into different phases: routine precise tasks are handled autonomously by the robotic system, while complex decision-making phases are handled by the surgeon. This segmentation allows the surgeon to focus only on tasks requiring judgment, reducing fatigue and human error while maintaining surgical adaptability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Measurement precision

If a robotic surgical system is implemented, then surgical precision is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

A control system acts as an intermediary between the surgeon and the robotic surgical system. This intermediary layer manages the complexity by handling autonomous operation, mode transitions, and handoff protocols, thereby reducing the operational complexity perceived by the surgeon while maintaining high surgical precision through robotic execution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12245822B2Surgical robot evolution and handoff
Publication Date: 2025.03.11 IX INNOVATION LLC
  • US12245822B2 patent drawing
  • US12245822B2 patent drawing
  • US12245822B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatuses, and systems for autonomous surgical robot evolution and handoff for manual operation are disclosed. A robotic surgical system performs surgery and is controlled jointly by an artificial intelligence (AI) and a surgeon. The surgeon can perform the entire surgery or can alternatively allow the AI to control the surgical robot to perform a part of or the entirety of the surgery. The AI is trained using data from previous surgeries, can provide indication to the surgeon when it has been sufficient trained to take over parts of a surgery, and can prompt the surgeon when there is insufficient training data for the AI to continue. Alternatively, a supervising surgeon can manually take back control of the surgical robot from the AI.