Robotic Surgical Instrument Positioning With Macro-Micro Kinematics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current robotic surgical assemblies face challenges in achieving precise kinematic control and miniaturization, with existing systems being cumbersome and requiring extensive training due to complex motion strategies and friction issues in tendon-guiding systems, limiting their versatility and precision in microsurgical procedures.

Innovation Solution

A robotic surgical assembly with a macro-positioning arm and multiple micro-positioning devices, each with motorized degrees of freedom, allows for precise translational and rotational movements, decoupling positioning and orientation within a shared workspace, and utilizing a tendon drive system with pretensioned tendons to minimize friction and enhance precision.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a plurality of independent movements are coordinated for small motions of the surgical instrument, then the surgical instrument can access the operating work-field, but the control of kinematic accuracy becomes difficult and the operating work-field becomes encumbered

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccess of surgical instruments to operating fieldVSAvoidcoordination of plurality of degrees of freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic assembly is divided into two independent subsystems: a macro-positioning arm for coarse positioning and micro-positioning devices for fine adjustments. This segmentation allows each subsystem to operate independently, simplifying control while maintaining access to the operating field.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The macro-positioning arm acts as an intermediary between the surgeon and the surgical instrument, providing coarse positioning that brings the instrument near the target site, while micro-positioning devices handle fine adjustments. This intermediary approach reduces the complexity of direct fine control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Ease of operation

If joints articulating the tip of the instrument are placed further away from the tip, then the instrument can be controlled, but the encumbrance effect increases and adequate movement is not allowed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol of surgical instrumentVSAvoidmovement of instrument tip in operating site
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The control architecture transitions from spatial arrangement of joints to a hierarchical control dimension, separating macro-positioning (coarse movement) from micro-positioning (fine movement). This dimensional separation allows control mechanisms to be positioned optimally without compromising instrument tip mobility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Volume of moving object

If tendon-guiding systems are used for miniaturization, then the system size is reduced, but friction issues arise that limit precision

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesize of robotic systemVSAvoidprecision of movement
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The tendon-guiding system is extracted from the macro-positioning arm and relocated to the micro-positioning devices near the instrument tip. This extraction allows the use of tendons only where miniaturization is critical, while larger components are positioned optimally for precision control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Extent of automation

If master-slave systems with mechanically linked motion recording stations are used, then teleoperation is achieved, but the learning curve is long and movement is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveteleoperation capabilityVSAvoidlearning curve and movement freedom
Core Design Contradiction:
Extent of automationVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system transitions from rigid mechanical linkage to a dynamic hierarchical control architecture where the macro-positioning arm and micro-positioning devices can operate independently or in coordination. This dynamic structure allows greater movement freedom and reduces the learning curve by enabling intuitive coarse positioning followed by precise adjustments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20240382278A1Roll/bayonet connection
Publication Date: 2024.11.21 MEDICAL MICROINSTRUMENTS INC
  • US20240382278A1 patent drawing
  • US20240382278A1 patent drawing
  • US20240382278A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic surgical assembly includes a support, one macro-positioning arm, connected to the support and having a plurality of degrees of freedom. The macro-positioning arm includes a support member, at least two micro-positioning devices, each having a plurality of motorized degrees of freedom, connected in cascade to the support member of the macro-positioning arm, and at least two medical instruments. Each instrument is connected in cascade to each of the micro-positioning device and includes a jointed device having a plurality of motorized degrees of freedom including a plurality of rotational joints. Each of the at least two medical instruments has a shaft, suitable for distancing the jointed device from the micro-positioning devices by a predetermined distance in a shaft direction.