Robotic Surgical System Voice Control and Tool Monitoring

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for preventing surgical errors and adverse events during surgeries are insufficient, leading to complications due to communication breakdowns, technical errors, and suboptimal tool functioning, which can result in patient harm and increased costs.

Innovation Solution

A robotic surgical system that allows surgeons to provide verbal commands for controlling surgical tools, with real-time feedback and alerts for operational limitations, enabling routine maintenance and tracking to ensure tools remain operational, and incorporating machine learning for improved precision and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional communication-based methods are used to prevent surgical errors, then implementation is simple, but effectiveness is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveeffectiveness of error preventionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces conventional communication-based error prevention methods with an automated robotic system that uses sensors, machine learning models, and real-time monitoring to detect and prevent surgical errors. The system substitutes human communication and manual verification with automated technological systems that continuously monitor surgical parameters, tool conditions, and procedural accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic surgical system performs self-monitoring and self-correction functions by automatically detecting tool malfunctions, tracking surgical progress, and alerting surgeons to potential errors without requiring manual intervention. The system serves itself by maintaining its own operational status and ensuring procedural accuracy through autonomous monitoring capabilities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If manual control of surgical tools is used, then surgeon flexibility is high, but precision and stability are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical precisionVSAvoidmanual control flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a robotic intermediary system that acts as a mediator between the surgeon's commands and the surgical tools. The robotic system receives verbal commands from the surgeon, processes them through machine learning models, and executes precise tool operations. This intermediary layer enhances precision while maintaining surgeon flexibility by allowing natural verbal interaction rather than complex manual manipulations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces manual mechanical control with voice-based control and automated robotic execution. Surgeons provide high-level verbal instructions, and the robotic system handles the precise mechanical operations, thereby improving surgical precision while maintaining operational ease through natural language interaction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Reliability

If surgical tools are not regularly maintained, then operational time is increased, but tool reliability decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool operational reliabilityVSAvoidmaintenance time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements continuous feedback monitoring of surgical tool conditions through integrated sensors that track operational parameters, wear levels, and functional status in real-time. This feedback system allows the robotic system to detect tool degradation early and schedule maintenance proactively, ensuring high reliability while minimizing unplanned downtime and optimizing maintenance timing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary maintenance actions by predicting tool failures before they occur based on sensor data and machine learning analysis. The robotic system schedules and executes maintenance tasks in advance, preventing tool failures that would compromise surgical reliability while optimizing the timing of maintenance to minimize operational disruption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

4Productivity

If more surgical tools are used to ensure availability, then tool availability increases, but inventory complexity and costs increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgical throughputVSAvoidinventory management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic surgical system performs self-monitoring of tool conditions and predictive maintenance, eliminating the need for multiple backup tools. The system maintains optimal tool functionality through autonomous monitoring and proactive maintenance scheduling, thereby ensuring high availability with a reduced inventory and simplifying management complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Data Source

PatentUS12062440B2System for maintaining and controlling surgical tools
Publication Date: 2024.08.13 IX INNOVATION LLC
  • US12062440B2 patent drawing
  • US12062440B2 patent drawing
  • US12062440B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, apparatuses, and systems for maintaining and controlling surgical tools are disclosed. For each surgical tool, a surgeon can give verbal commands which can result in feedback provided by a synthesized voice or the execution of an action as instructed by the verbal command. The tools are monitored during use to ensure the tools remain within their operating parameters. The system alerts the surgeon should the tools approach their operational limitations.