Robotic Tank Cleaning Arm for Leak-Free Nuclear Waste Removal

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for removing nuclear waste from large underground tanks are hazardous for humans due to radiation and structural instability, and often require injecting liquids that can lead to leaks, making it difficult to safely remove solid waste and sludge without introducing water or fluids.

Innovation Solution

A robotics-based Tank Cleaning System (TCS) that deploys a mast assembly, arm assembly, and debris removal tools to access and remove debris from tanks without human entry, using mechanical and hydraulic components to manipulate tools like plow and bucket tools, and a computerized control system for remote operation, ensuring all electrical systems remain outside the tank.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If liquid injection method is used to remove waste, then waste removal efficiency is improved, but risk of tank leakage increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvewaste removal efficiencyVSAvoidtank structural integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the harmful liquid injection step from the waste removal process. Instead of injecting liquids into the tank to create slurry, the system uses a robotic arm with specialized tools (plow, bucket, vacuum) to mechanically remove waste directly from the tank bottom, eliminating the source of potential leaks while maintaining waste removal efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the hydraulic/liquid-based waste removal system with a mechanical robotic system. The robotic arm equipped with plow, bucket, and vacuum tools mechanically scoops and removes waste directly, substituting the liquid injection method that caused structural stress and leakage risks

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If human entry into tank is required for cleaning, then direct observation and manual operation are improved, but exposure to radiation and hazardous conditions increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedirect observation and manual controlVSAvoidradiation and hazardous exposure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a robotic arm as an intermediary between the operator and the hazardous tank environment. The robotic system transmits operator commands and provides video feedback, allowing indirect observation and control without human exposure to radiation. The robotic arm acts as the mediator that performs dangerous tasks while keeping humans safe

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a virtual copy of the tank environment through video cameras and displays, allowing operators to observe and control operations remotely. Instead of direct human observation inside the tank, the system uses visual copying through camera feeds to provide situational awareness without physical exposure

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Reliability

If robust remote retrieval equipment is deployed, then safety is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational safetyVSAvoidrobotic system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the complex robotic system into modular, interchangeable tools attached to a common robotic arm platform. The system uses separate plow, bucket, and vacuum tools that can be attached and detached as needed, making the complex functionality manageable through modular design rather than a single monolithic complex system

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent creates a universal robotic arm platform that can perform multiple waste removal functions through different tools. The single robotic arm can switch between plowing, bucket scooping, and vacuuming operations, consolidating multiple functions into one system rather than requiring separate complex equipment for each task

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS11573555B2Tank cleaning system
Publication Date: 2023.02.07 VEOLIA NUCLEAR SOLUTIONS INC
  • US11573555B2 patent drawing
  • US11573555B2 patent drawing
  • US11573555B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are disclosed for inspection, maintenance, debris removal, and cleaning of environments that may be difficult to access and hazardous. The system comprises a mast assembly, an arm assembly, a debris removal system, and a drive system. The mast assembly comprises an inner mast and an outer mast having a central axis about which the arm assembly revolves. The arm assembly provides support for the debris removal system. The debris removal system comprises a bucket tool, a plow tool, and one or more hoses for clearing and removing debris. The drive system comprises a plurality of one or more of cables, pulleys, rollers, and hoists to at least one of control motion of the arm assembly, raise and lower the inner mast, and position and control at least one of the bucket tool and the plow tool. The system is at least one of manually or automatically controlled.