Robotic Tapping Machine Positioning for Reproducible ASTM IIC Testing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for Impact Insulation Class (IIC), Apparent Impact Insulation Class (AIIC), and Field Impact Insulation Class (FIIC) testing require manual movement of a tapping machine to multiple positions, which is time-consuming, imprecise, and often deviates from the required locations, affecting the accuracy and reproducibility of impact noise measurements.

Innovation Solution

An automated robotic platform with sensors, a controller, and motors is retrofitted to the tapping machine, enabling wireless control from below to precisely position the machine in the required locations for testing, allowing a single person to conduct the tests efficiently and accurately.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If manual movement of the tapping machine is used, then the testing procedure is simple, but the positioning precision and reproducibility deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical positioning system with an automated robotic system that uses sensors, motors, and wireless control to position the tapping machine. This substitution eliminates human error in positioning while maintaining operational simplicity through automated control algorithms and pre-programmed test sequences.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system performs self-positioning and self-measurement functions. The tapping machine automatically moves to required positions, executes impact tests, and records data without requiring manual intervention for each measurement point, thereby improving precision while keeping the overall system manageable through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Productivity

If manual movement of the tapping machine is used, then the device structure is simple, but the testing time and labor requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting efficiencyVSAvoidtesting time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system enables continuous automated operation where the tapping machine sequentially visits all required measurement positions without interruption. The system performs impact tests and data recording continuously across multiple positions, eliminating the time losses associated with manual repositioning and setup between measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system pre-programs all test positions, paths, and measurement sequences before execution. The robotic platform is pre-configured with the complete test protocol, allowing it to automatically navigate to each position and perform measurements in the correct sequence without requiring real-time decision-making or manual setup during the actual testing process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If manual movement of the tapping machine is used, then the operation procedure is simple, but the reproducibility and consistency of test results deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovereproducibilityVSAvoidautomation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system incorporates sensors that continuously monitor the position, orientation, and operational parameters of the tapping machine. This feedback mechanism ensures that each impact test is executed with precise repeatability, automatically correcting any deviations from the intended test protocol and ensuring consistent measurement conditions across all test positions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses dynamic control algorithms that adapt the robotic platform's movement and positioning in real-time to maintain optimal test conditions. The automation system dynamically adjusts positioning accuracy, movement speeds, and measurement timing based on sensor feedback, ensuring reproducible results while managing the complexity through intelligent control rather than rigid mechanical constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS12487158B2Automated testing system
Publication Date: 2025.12.02 NOISEOUT
  • US12487158B2 patent drawing
  • US12487158B2 patent drawing
  • US12487158B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic platform for a tapping machine includes a sensor, a controller, a wireless interface directly or indirectly connected to the controller, a frame for receiving a tapping machine and a motor attached to the frame for moving the frame with the tapping machine received thereon. The frame is configured to exhibit dimensions and strength to hold a tapping machine, or other machine with a proportional-derivative control, where upon commands provided to it by the controller, the motor moves the frame and tapping machine, or other machine, through the four positions required by the ASTM test methods, under wireless control.