Hand-Held Robotic Surgical Tool Alignment for Precise Resection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing surgical robotic systems face challenges such as cumbersome large robots, limited adjustability of hand-held instruments, and navigation systems that distract users from the surgical site, requiring improved systems for precise and efficient tissue resection.

Innovation Solution

A hand-held surgical robotic system with a movable blade support and actuator assembly allowing multiple degrees of freedom, featuring visual alignment indicators to ensure optimal positioning and alignment of the blade support relative to the hand-held portion.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If physical cutting guides are used to constrain surgical tools, then manufacturing precision of cuts is improved, but loss of time increases due to positioning and securing requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut precisionVSAvoidpositioning time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces physical cutting guides with a robotic system that uses computer vision and haptic feedback to guide the surgical tool. The robotic system provides real-time alignment guidance through visual displays and force feedback, eliminating the need for physical guides while maintaining cut precision and reducing positioning time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses virtual models and digital replicas of the surgical site to guide the procedure. A pre-operative 3D model is created and used to plan the surgery, with the robotic system providing real-time navigation based on this digital copy, replacing the need for physical cutting guides.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

2Manufacturing precision

If navigation systems with displays are used to track tool position, then manufacturing precision is improved, but ease of operation worsens due to user distraction from the surgical site

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool alignment precisionVSAvoiduser focus
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the navigation display with the surgical field of view by projecting alignment indicators directly onto or near the surgical site. The haptic feedback mechanism combines tactile guidance with visual feedback, allowing the user to maintain focus on the surgical site while receiving precise alignment information through both touch and sight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces haptic feedback as an intermediary between the navigation system and the user. The force feedback mechanism translates digital alignment information into tactile cues that the user can feel, serving as a mediator that conveys precision information without requiring visual attention away from the surgical site.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Manufacturing precision

If robotic hand-held instruments with actuators are used to align tools, then manufacturing precision is improved, but adaptability worsens due to limited range of adjustability

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetool alignment precisionVSAvoidadjustability range
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a dynamic adjustment system where the robotic hand-held instrument can be repositioned and reoriented during the procedure. The actuator assembly allows for real-time modification of the tool's position and angle, enabling the system to adapt to different surgical scenarios while maintaining precise alignment through active control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes multiple adjustable parameters including the position of the actuator assembly, the angle of the blade support, and the orientation of the hand-held portion. By changing these parameters dynamically, the system achieves both precise alignment and broad adaptability to various surgical requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If large robots with six degrees of freedom are used, then adaptability is improved, but device complexity increases making them cumbersome to operate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemovement flexibilityVSAvoidrobot structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the robotic system into separate functional modules: a hand-held portion for user control, an actuator assembly for positioning, and a blade support for tool mounting. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized independently, reducing overall complexity while maintaining six degrees of freedom for adaptive positioning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements a dynamic, modular robotic system where the hand-held portion can be freely positioned and oriented by the user, and the actuator assembly dynamically adjusts the blade support position. This dynamic architecture provides six degrees of freedom without the complexity of a fully rigid robotic arm, making the system more maneuverable and easier to operate.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS20260026903A1Robotic Hand-Held Surgical Instrument Systems And Methods
Publication Date: 2026.01.29 MAKO SURGICAL CORP
  • US20260026903A1 patent drawing
  • US20260026903A1 patent drawing
  • US20260026903A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A system is provided comprising a surgical robotic system for use with a tool. In some versions, the robotic instrument comprises a hand-held portion to be held by a user and a tool support movably coupled to the hand-held portion to support the tool. The robotic system further includes an actuator assembly operatively attached to the tool support and the hand-held portion and configured to move the tool support relative to the hand-held portion in a plurality of degrees of freedom. The robotic system may include a handle alignment member extending from the hand-held portion. At least a portion of the handle alignment member and a tool plane defined by the tool are aligned when the tool support has an optimal range of motion relative to the hand-held portion.