Robotic Work Tool Beacon-Based Obstacle Detection to Reduce Wear

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing robotic work tools face challenges in efficiently detecting and navigating around temporary and dynamic obstacles, as current methods are cumbersome, prone to increased wear and tear, and unsuitable for virtual obstacles, especially in residential areas.

Innovation Solution

A robotic work tool system equipped with a beacon marker and sensor that uses radio frequency or ultrasonic signals to mark obstacles, allowing the tool to adapt its operation based on proximity, reducing the need for physical markers and minimizing interference.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If collision detection is used to detect obstacles, then the robotic tool can detect physical obstacles, but the wear and tear of the robotic tool increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection capabilityVSAvoidwear and tear
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical collision detection with electromagnetic sensing. The robotic tool uses sensors (e.g., capacitive, inductive, or optical sensors) to detect obstacles at a distance, substituting the mechanical impact-based detection method with a non-contact electromagnetic field-based detection system, thereby eliminating wear and tear from repeated collisions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary sensing mechanism between the robotic tool and the obstacle. Instead of direct mechanical contact, the tool uses electromagnetic fields or other intermediary detection methods to sense the presence of obstacles, allowing detection without physical contact and thus preventing wear and damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If boundary wires are dug down to mark obstacles, then permanent structures can be marked, but the installation becomes cumbersome for temporary obstacles

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle marking accuracyVSAvoidinstallation effort
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transitions from static, permanent boundary wires to dynamic, flexible markers. The system allows obstacle markers to be temporarily placed and easily repositioned based on changing conditions, enabling the same marking system to adapt to both permanent and temporary obstacles without requiring digging or permanent installation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the physical state or form of the boundary markers from fixed underground wires to removable surface markers or electronic markers. This parameter change allows the markers to be easily installed and removed, accommodating temporary obstacles while maintaining detection accuracy through alternative marker technologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Speed

If high power signals are used for beacon markers, then obstacle detection range is improved, but interference in residential areas increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection rangeVSAvoidsignal interference
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic or pulsed signal transmission instead of continuous high-power signals. The beacon markers transmit signals in periodic bursts or pulses, allowing the robotic tool to detect obstacles at extended ranges during transmission peaks while minimizing average power output and reducing continuous interference in residential areas.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses partial action by transmitting signals only when necessary for detection rather than continuously at full power. The system modulates signal strength and transmission timing to provide sufficient detection range only when needed, reducing overall interference while maintaining effective obstacle detection capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This solution enables easy and efficient detection of obstacles, reduces wear and tear on the robotic tool, and effectively handles temporary and virtual obstacles without the need for complex setup or high power usage, improving navigation and operation in various environments.

Implementation Method 1

A robotic work tool system equipped with a beacon marker and sensor that uses radio frequency or ultrasonic signals to mark obstacles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRadio frequency signal transmission: Electromagnetic Induction

Implementation Method 2

A robotic work tool system equipped with a beacon marker and sensor that uses radio frequency or ultrasonic signals to mark obstacles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectUltrasonic signal transmission: Ultrasound

Data Source

PatentUS10782705B2Obstacle detection for a robotic working tool
Publication Date: 2020.09.22 HUSQVARNA AB
  • US10782705B2 patent drawing
  • US10782705B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic work tool system (200) comprising a robotic work tool (100) and a beacon marker (280), said robotic work tool (100) comprising a beacon sensor (175) configured to sense a signal being transmitted by the beacon marker (280), said beacon marker (280) marking an area (270) around an obstacle (260) in a work area (205) in which said robotic work tool (100) is arranged to operate, wherein said robotic work tool is configured to determine a proximity to a beacon marker (280) and to adapt its operation accordingly.