Robotic Tote Storage Grid Layout for Dense, Serviceable Retrieval

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing material handling systems in facilities face challenges in achieving high storage density, throughput, flexibility, modularity, scalability, and serviceability, leading to inefficiencies in processes such as item storage, retrieval, and shipping.

Innovation Solution

An automated storage and retrieval system utilizing robotic drive units and totes that traverse shelving systems via highway grids and elevators, equipped with imaging sensors and fiducial markers for navigation, enabling flexible and modular operation with multiple processing stations and service access zones.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional material handling systems are used, then operational simplicity is maintained, but storage density and throughput are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system is divided into modular components including autonomous mobile robots, adjustable shelving units, and interchangeable totes. Each robot operates independently on highway grids, and shelving can be reconfigured in different patterns (e.g., U-shaped, linear) to optimize for different throughput requirements without redesigning the entire system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system employs dynamically adjustable elements including variable shelving heights, reconfigurable storage locations, and robots that can adapt their paths and operations in real-time. The control system dynamically assigns tasks to robots based on current system state and priorities, enabling flexible response to changing throughput demands.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Quantity of substance

If storage density is increased, then space utilization improves, but accessibility and serviceability of components deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvestorage densityVSAvoidserviceability
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSEase of repair

Solution Approach 1:

The high-density storage structure is segmented into modular shelving units that can be independently accessed and serviced. Robots can navigate to specific locations within the dense structure, and individual shelves or totes can be removed or adjusted without disrupting the entire storage system, maintaining serviceability despite high density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates automated monitoring and maintenance capabilities where robots can perform routine inspections and adjustments of shelving components. The control system tracks component status and can schedule maintenance during low-activity periods, enabling the system to service itself without extensive human intervention.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Productivity

If automated robotic systems are implemented, then operational efficiency increases, but system flexibility and adaptability may be reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational efficiencyVSAvoidsystem flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic system is designed with universal capabilities where robots can perform multiple functions including transporting totes, adjusting shelving positions, and interacting with various storage configurations. The control system can assign different task types to the same physical robots, allowing the system to adapt to different operational requirements without adding specialized equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system maintains flexibility through dynamic task assignment and reconfigurable operations. Robots can change their behavior and paths in real-time based on control system instructions, and storage configurations can be dynamically adjusted to accommodate different item types and retrieval patterns, ensuring adaptability alongside automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Adaptability or versatility

If modular and scalable design is implemented, then system adaptability improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovemodularityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses standardized modular components including identical robot platforms, interchangeable totes, and uniform shelving units. This segmentation allows components to be easily added, removed, or reconfigured without affecting the core system architecture, providing scalability while managing complexity through standardization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Multiple functional elements are merged into integrated components where robots incorporate navigation, manipulation, and communication systems in single units. The control system merges task management, scheduling, and coordination functions into a unified software platform, reducing the apparent complexity despite the modular physical architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS12589941B2Flexible, robotic automated storage and retrieval system
Publication Date: 2026.03.31 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12589941B2 patent drawing
  • US12589941B2 patent drawing
  • US12589941B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Flexible, robotic automated storage and retrieval systems and processes may include one or more blocks of shelving systems, each block including a plurality of floors, and each floor including a plurality of storage grid locations for respective totes. A plurality of robotic drive units may traverse the storage grid locations using a plurality of highway grids and elevators to move totes between processing stations and storage grid locations. The freely movable robotic drive units and totes enable high flexibility, modularity, scalability, and serviceability of the flexible, robotic automated storage and retrieval systems.