Robotic Uterine Manipulation System for Minimally Invasive Surgery

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for uterine manipulation during minimally invasive hysterectomies are physically demanding and lack precision, as they rely on manual manipulation by surgical residents or fellows, who often face challenges due to the large footprint of surgical robots and awkward angles.

Innovation Solution

A robotic anatomical manipulation system comprising a robot with a cart and arm, a console with a joystick and user interface, a mechanical interface to hold and release an end effector, and sensors to measure force and torque, allowing for precise positioning and control of the uterus through real-time user inputs.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If manual manipulation by surgical residents or fellows is used, then the procedure can be performed with simpler equipment, but the physical demand increases and precision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment simplicityVSAvoidphysical demand
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical manipulation system with an automated robotic arm system. The robotic arm, controlled by a console, substitutes the human hands and physical effort of surgical residents or fellows, thereby reducing physical demand while maintaining equipment simplicity through the use of a relatively compact robotic mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system enables the surgeon to control the manipulation from a console, allowing the surgical team to work more efficiently. The system serves itself by automatically positioning and manipulating the anatomy according to surgeon input, reducing the physical burden on surgical staff.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Area of stationary object

If manual manipulation by surgical residents or fellows is used, then the equipment footprint can be smaller, but the manipulation precision decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment footprintVSAvoidmanipulation precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The robotic arm replaces manual manipulation, providing precise control through motorized joints and control algorithms. This substitution enables high manipulation precision while keeping the equipment footprint manageable through the use of a compact, multi-jointed robotic arm design that can operate in confined surgical spaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic arm employs dynamic control with multiple degrees of freedom, allowing it to adapt its motion and positioning in real-time. This dynamic capability enables precise manipulation of the anatomy while maintaining a compact equipment footprint that can be positioned optimally in the surgical field.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Manufacturing precision

If a robotic arm with sensors and control system is implemented, then manipulation precision improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemanipulation precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a robotic arm with integrated sensors and control systems to replace manual manipulation. This substitution achieves high manipulation precision through force sensors, torque measurements, and computer-controlled motion, while managing system complexity through modular architecture and integration of commercial off-the-shelf components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The robotic system incorporates force sensors and torque sensors that provide real-time feedback to the control system. This feedback mechanism enables precise control and monitoring of the manipulation forces, achieving high manipulation precision while managing system complexity through intelligent control algorithms that process sensor data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

4Ease of operation

If the surgeon controls from a console away from the operating table, then physical strain on surgical staff is reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvephysical strainVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a console as an intermediary device that allows the surgeon to control the robotic arm from a distance. This console acts as a mediator between the surgeon's commands and the robotic system, reducing physical strain on surgical staff by eliminating the need for direct manual manipulation while managing system complexity through standardized communication protocols and control interfaces.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentUS12318117B2Robotic anatomical manipulation systems and methods
Publication Date: 2025.06.03 MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENT
  • US12318117B2 patent drawing
  • US12318117B2 patent drawing
  • US12318117B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention provides, in various embodiments, systems and methods for robotic manipulation of a patient's anatomy, such as the uterus, during surgical procedures.