Robotic Vacuum Gesture Control Using IMU for Intuitive Operation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Modern robotic vacuum cleaners have limited user input capabilities and small user interfaces, making it cumbersome for users to provide instructions, which can be non-intuitive and difficult to operate effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that utilize an inertia measurement unit (IMU) to sense user-induced displacements, allowing the robotic cleaning device to determine characteristics of the displacement and set operational modes, such as 'reset' or 'wireless setup', without requiring operation of the user interface, using existing IMU hardware.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a traditional user interface (UI) is used for inputting instructions, then the device can receive user commands, but the UI size is small making it cumbersome to operate and the input data types are limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of providing instructionsVSAvoidUI complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces the mechanical/electronic user interface system with a motion-based control system. The IMU sensor detects physical movements (shaking, lifting, rotating) of the device, and these mechanical actions are translated into digital commands. This substitution eliminates the need for a complex small-screen UI while maintaining command input capability, directly resolving the contradiction between ease of operation and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Ease of operation

If the UI is made larger to improve operability, then user input becomes easier, but the device size and portability are compromised

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of providing instructionsVSAvoiddevice size
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSArea of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent substitutes the visual-mechanical interaction of a large physical UI with a motion-detection system. The IMU-based motion recognition allows users to input commands through body movements (shaking, lifting, rotating) rather than manipulating a large physical interface. This maintains device compactness while dramatically improving ease of operation, resolving the contradiction between UI operability and device size.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Ease of operation

If motion sensing is implemented to enable gesture-based control, then user interaction becomes more intuitive, but the requirement for additional sensors increases device complexity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveintuitiveness of interactionVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the IMU sensor multi-functional by using it for both its original navigation/positioning functions and the new motion-based user interface function. The same sensor that tracks the device's location and orientation during cleaning operations is also used to detect user gestures for command input. This eliminates the need for separate gesture-sensing hardware, maintaining intuitiveness while avoiding additional device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of operation

If the robotic device is lifted off the floor to provide input, then gesture-based control is enabled, but this may be confused with the device attempting to move autonomously

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegesture-based input capabilityVSAvoiddisplacement cause discrimination
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses the magnitude and characteristics of acceleration detected by the IMU to distinguish between user-induced gestures and autonomous movement attempts. User gestures (lifting, shaking, rotating) produce specific acceleration patterns that differ from normal cleaning operations. By analyzing the excessive acceleration magnitude and pattern, the system can reliably differentiate user input from autonomous navigation commands, resolving the contradiction between gesture-based input and operational reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Facilitates easier user interaction by allowing instructions to be provided through physical gestures, such as shaking or rotating the device, enabling intuitive operation and wireless setup without the need for complex UI interaction, enhancing user convenience and device functionality.

Implementation Method 1

sensing a displacement of the robotic cleaning device, determining a characteristic of the displacement of the robotic cleaning device

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectInertial measurement: Inertia

Data Source

PatentUS11099554B2Robotic cleaning device and a method of controlling the robotic cleaning device
Publication Date: 2021.08.24 AB ELECTROLUX
  • US11099554B2 patent drawing
  • US11099554B2 patent drawing
  • US11099554B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robotic cleaning device having an inertia measurement unit and a controller. The inertia measurement unit is arranged to sense a displacement of the robotic cleaning device and the controller is arranged to determine a characteristic of the displacement of the robotic cleaning device, and to set the robotic cleaning device in an operational mode being associated with the determined characteristic of the displacement.