Robotic Vehicle Battery Swapping for Continuous Container Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Robotic container-handling vehicles in automated storage and retrieval systems face downtime due to the need to recharge on-board batteries, which either requires additional vehicles or reduces operational efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The robotic vehicles are modified to use a gripping device to swap batteries from a stack for recharging, allowing continuous operation without visiting a charging station.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the robotic vehicle uses an on-board rechargeable battery to provide power for operation, then the vehicle can operate autonomously, but the vehicle must stop to recharge when the battery is discharged, causing downtime and reducing productivity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveautonomous operationVSAvoidcontainer handling operations
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The power system is segmented into multiple removable battery units rather than a single large battery. Each battery unit can be independently replaced, allowing the vehicle to swap batteries quickly without lengthy recharging cycles, thus maintaining autonomous operation while minimizing downtime and maximizing productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameter from single-battery operation to multi-battery operation. By having multiple battery units available, the vehicle can switch between them, effectively extending its operational duration without interruption and eliminating the productivity loss associated with recharging.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If additional robotic container-handling vehicles are deployed to compensate for recharging downtime, then continuous container handling can be maintained, but the system complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontinuous container handlingVSAvoidnumber of vehicles required
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of adding more complete vehicles to ensure continuous operation, the system segments the power supply into multiple battery units that can be rapidly exchanged. This allows a single vehicle to maintain continuous productivity through battery swapping, avoiding the need to deploy additional vehicles and thereby reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The recharging function is extracted from the vehicle's operational cycle by providing external battery units that are already charged. The vehicle takes out the discharged battery and replaces it with a charged one, separating the power replenishment process from the vehicle's movement and operation, thus maintaining continuous productivity without additional vehicles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

3Use of energy by moving object

If the vehicle visits a charging station to recharge the battery, then the battery can be recharged, but the vehicle is unavailable during recharging and operational efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebattery rechargingVSAvoiddowntime away from container handling
Core Design Contradiction:
Use of energy by moving objectVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

Battery units are pre-charged before being installed in the vehicle. Instead of charging the battery while the vehicle is in operation (which causes downtime), the charging action is performed in advance on spare battery units, so that when a battery needs replacement, a fully charged unit is already available, eliminating downtime and maintaining continuous operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system ensures continuous useful action by maintaining a supply of pre-charged battery units. The vehicle can continuously swap batteries without interruption to its container handling operations, keeping the useful action of container handling continuous while the charging action occurs separately in the background on replacement batteries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Data Source

PatentEP4624371A1A robotic vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.10.01 AUTOSTORE TECH AS
  • EP4624371A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4624371A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4624371A1 patent drawingFigure 3A~3B

AI summary

A robotic vehicle (502) for use in an automated storage and retrieval system. The robotic vehicle comprises a body, a gripping device (508) and an electrical energy storage device (550). The gripping device (508) is arranged to be lowered from and raised to the body and to engage and disengage a container (112). The electrical energy storage device is arranged to at least partly power the robotic vehicle (502). At least one of the electrical energy storage device and the gripping device is further arranged to releasably engage the other device. The gripping device (508) is arranged to raise the electrical energy storage device (550), when engaged therewith, into electrical communication with the body to at least partly power the vehicle (502).