Robust Alarm System with Integrity Checks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Physiological measurement systems in healthcare often lack reliable alarm mechanisms, which can lead to patient injury or death due to potential failures in alerting caregivers when vital signs exceed predetermined limits.

Innovation Solution

A robust alarm system is implemented, featuring redundant alarms, drive circuit integrity checks, and alarm integrity checks, utilizing an alarm controller that generates drive signals and verifies the integrity of alarm subsystems through sensors like ultrasound, optical, and piezoelectric detectors, ensuring concurrent activation of multiple alarms and fault detection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a single alarm mechanism is used, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability of alarm notification is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm reliabilityVSAvoidalarm system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The alarm system is divided into multiple independent alarm subsystems (first alarm subsystem and second alarm subsystem), each capable of independent operation. This segmentation allows the system to maintain functionality even if one subsystem fails, thereby improving reliability without requiring a completely complex integrated system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements integrity check mechanisms that proactively detect potential failures in alarm subsystems before they actually fail during critical events. The circuit tester continuously monitors the operational status of each alarm subsystem, and when a degradation or potential failure is detected, the system can switch to redundant subsystems in advance, cushioning against complete alarm failure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

2Reliability

If redundant alarm subsystems are implemented, then the reliability increases, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm notification reliabilityVSAvoidalarm subsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The controller is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as the control unit for activating alarm subsystems and as the integrity checker for monitoring their operational status. This universal design reduces the need for separate dedicated components, thereby managing complexity while maintaining redundancy for improved reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements continuous feedback loops where the controller monitors the integrity of alarm subsystems and automatically adjusts its behavior based on the feedback. When integrity checks indicate a subsystem is failing, the controller can switch to alternative subsystems or activate backup mechanisms, managing complexity through intelligent control rather than sheer component multiplication.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If integrity check mechanisms are added, then the reliability is improved, but the device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealarm system reliabilityVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The integrity check mechanism operates periodically rather than continuously, with the controller checking the operational status of alarm subsystems at predetermined intervals. This periodic operation maintains system reliability through regular monitoring while significantly reducing energy consumption compared to continuous monitoring, as the circuit tester is activated only at specific check points rather than continuously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The robust alarm system significantly increases reliability by preventing alarm failures, allowing for continuous notification of critical physiological events even if one alarm fails, thereby enhancing patient safety.

Implementation Method 1

detecting alarm transducer movement or vibration utilizing ultrasound, optical or piezoelectric sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

detecting alarm transducer movement or vibration utilizing ultrasound, optical or piezoelectric sensors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPiezoelectric effect: Piezoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS12178620B2Robust alarm system
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 MASIMO CORP
  • US12178620B2 patent drawing
  • US12178620B2 patent drawing
  • US12178620B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A robust alarm system has an alarm controller adapted to input an alarm trigger and to generate at least one alarm drive signal in response. Alarm subsystems input the alarm drive signal and activate one or more of multiple alarms accordingly. A subsystem function signal provides feedback to the alarm controller as to alarm subsystem integrity. A malfunction indicator is output from the alarm controller in response to a failure within the alarm subsystems.