Radiation Treatment Planning With Robust Field Geometry

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing radiation treatment plans often fail to discriminate between target volumes and adjacent tissues, leading to potential collateral damage due to uncertainties in patient positioning and anatomy, resulting in dosimetric inaccuracies.

Innovation Solution

A control circuit identifies field geometry parameter values and determines dosimetric robustness to optimize radiation treatment plans, ensuring stability against variations in patient positioning and anatomy by selecting robust field geometries.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If radiation therapy is applied to treat target volumes, then therapeutic effect is improved, but collateral damage to adjacent tissues increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetherapeutic effectVSAvoidcollateral damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by differentiating treatment parameters for different spatial regions. The system calculates dosimetric robustness for specific field geometry parameters (such as beam angle, position, and shape) and selects parameters that maximize therapeutic effect on the target volume while minimizing exposure to adjacent tissues. This localized optimization ensures that radiation delivery is tailored to specific anatomical regions rather than applying uniform treatment throughout.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by systematically varying field geometry parameters to optimize treatment outcomes. The system evaluates multiple parameter combinations (beam angles, positions, shapes) and selects those that achieve the desired dosimetric robustness. By changing these geometric parameters, the system can reshape the radiation distribution to better conform to the target volume while sparing surrounding healthy tissues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If field geometry parameters are optimized manually based on planner experience, then treatment plan quality is improved, but treatment time and productivity are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetreatment plan qualityVSAvoidtreatment time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements self-service by enabling the treatment planning system to automatically evaluate and optimize field geometry parameters without requiring extensive manual intervention. The system autonomously calculates dosimetric robustness for different parameter combinations and selects optimal parameters based on predefined criteria, reducing the time planners need to manually adjust settings while maintaining high treatment plan quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies feedback by implementing an iterative optimization process where the system evaluates dosimetric robustness for candidate parameter sets and uses this feedback to refine subsequent iterations. The system automatically adjusts parameters based on the calculated robustness metrics, converging on optimal solutions more quickly than manual methods and thereby reducing overall treatment planning time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Ease of operation

If beam placement is determined using templated solutions, then ease of operation is improved, but manufacturing precision and treatment accuracy are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of beam placementVSAvoidtreatment accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses parameter changes by allowing the system to automatically adjust field geometry parameters based on patient-specific anatomical data and treatment objectives. Rather than relying on fixed templates, the system dynamically calculates optimal parameters (beam angles, positions, shapes) that achieve the desired dosimetric robustness for each individual patient, thereby improving treatment accuracy while maintaining ease of operation through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentEP4631568A1Method and apparatus to facilitate optimizing a radiation treatment plan
Publication Date: 2025.10.15 SIEMENS HEALTHINEERS INTERNATIONAL AG
  • EP4631568A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4631568A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4631568A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A control circuit identifies at least one field geometry parameter value 201 and then determines 203 dosimetric robustness for the at least one field geometry parameter value to produce a robustness assessment. The control circuit can then determine 205 whether the robustness assessment is satisfactory, and when true, optimize 206 a radiation treatment plan using the at least one field geometry parameter value.