Robust Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Uncertain Dynamics

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) techniques fail to account for uncertainty in reward functions and transition dynamics, which is common in real-world applications.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of uncertainty in reward functions and transition dynamics within the MARL framework, referred to as robust MARL, which models the problem as a robust Markov game and uses techniques such as Q-learning and multi-agent policy gradient algorithms to find robust Nash equilibrium policies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If existing MARL techniques are used, then the learning process is simple, but the policies are not robust to uncertainty in reward functions and transition dynamics

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverobustness of MARL policiesVSAvoidcomplexity of MARL framework
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a virtual agent as an intermediary that represents uncertainty in reward functions and transition dynamics. This virtual agent interacts with the environment and other agents, allowing the system to model and learn robust policies against uncertain conditions without fundamentally redesigning the entire MARL framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies the MARL framework by changing the parameters being optimized - specifically, learning policies that are robust to variations in reward functions and transition dynamics rather than optimizing for single deterministic outcomes. This involves learning under distributional uncertainty and modeling worst-case scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If robust MARL is implemented to handle uncertainty, then policy robustness improves, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresilience to uncertaintyVSAvoidcomputational resources required
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the learning process into multiple components: virtual agents representing different uncertainty scenarios, individual agent policies, and a coordination mechanism. This segmentation allows parallel computation of multiple uncertainty scenarios and distributes the computational burden across multiple learning processes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary learning with virtual agents to model uncertainty and worst-case scenarios before deploying actual agent policies. This preliminary action prepares the system to handle uncertainty efficiently during execution without requiring complex real-time computations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Adaptability or versatility

If uncertainty modeling is added to MARL, then real-world applicability improves, but the learning algorithm becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to real-world scenariosVSAvoidalgorithmic complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates virtual copies (virtual agents) of the actual agents, where each virtual agent represents a possible scenario under uncertainty. These virtual copies interact with the environment to learn robust policies without requiring complex modifications to the actual agent implementation, simplifying the deployment process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

Solution Approach 2:

The virtual agent framework serves multiple functions: modeling uncertainty, representing worst-case scenarios, enabling robust policy learning, and providing a unified interface for different types of uncertainty. This multi-functionality reduces the need for separate mechanisms for each type of uncertainty handling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12265924B1Robust multi-agent reinforcement learning
Publication Date: 2025.04.01 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US12265924B1 patent drawing
  • US12265924B1 patent drawing
  • US12265924B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for robust multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL) are described. An exemplary method includes initializing a plurality of parameters for a plurality of agents including at least policy parameters and action-value (Q) parameters; performing robust multi-agent reinforcement learning to learn polices for the agents, wherein in the learned polices no agent has an incentive to deviate, the agents include an implicit agent that is to select a worst-case at any given time during the learning process; and at least one agent utilizing its learned policy.