Policy Neural Network Training for Robust Continuous Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reinforcement learning agents are sensitive to environment perturbations, leading to sub-optimal performance when deployed in real-world settings different from their training environments, due to model misspecification.

Innovation Solution

Training a policy neural network to account for perturbations by jointly optimizing it with a Q-value neural network using a robust entropy-regularized temporal difference error, which measures errors based on perturbed states to enhance robustness.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If reinforcement learning agents are trained in a single environment, then training simplicity is maintained, but the agents become sensitive to environment perturbations and perform sub-optimally when deployed in different environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance robustnessVSAvoidtraining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by incorporating perturbation handling into the training phase. Specifically, the system generates perturbed versions of training environments and trains the agent to handle these perturbations before actual deployment. This preliminary exposure to perturbations during training ensures the agent develops robustness against environmental changes when deployed in real-world settings different from the training environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Productivity

If the agent is trained in simulation, then training efficiency is improved, but the policy becomes sensitive to real-world environment perturbations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining efficiencyVSAvoiddeployment robustness
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by incorporating perturbation handling into the training phase. Specifically, the system generates perturbed versions of training environments and trains the agent to handle these perturbations before actual deployment. This preliminary exposure to perturbations during training ensures the agent develops robustness against environmental changes when deployed in real-world settings different from the training environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent converts the harmful effect of simulation-to-reality gap into a benefit by deliberately introducing perturbations during simulation training. The system uses perturbed training environments to teach the agent to handle real-world variations, turning the previously harmful sensitivity to perturbations into a beneficial robustness feature that improves deployment performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #22Blessing in disguise (Convert harm into benefit)

3Productivity

If the policy is optimized for the training environment, then training performance is maximized, but the policy fails to generalize to perturbed environments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraining performanceVSAvoidenvironment generalization
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by incorporating perturbation handling into the training phase. Specifically, the system generates perturbed versions of training environments and trains the agent to handle these perturbations before actual deployment. This preliminary exposure to perturbations during training ensures the agent develops robustness against environmental changes when deployed in real-world settings different from the training environment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies universality by training the agent to perform the same task across multiple perturbed environment variations. Instead of optimizing for a single training environment, the system trains the policy to handle various perturbations (lighting changes, sensor noise, actuator noise), making the policy universally applicable across different environmental conditions while maintaining consistent task performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12614067B2Robust reinforcement learning for continuous control with model misspecification
Publication Date: 2026.04.28 GDM HOLDING LLC
  • US12614067B2 patent drawing
  • US12614067B2 patent drawing
  • US12614067B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for training a policy neural network having policy parameters. One of the methods includes sampling a mini-batch comprising one or more observation-action-reward tuples generated as a result of interactions of a first agent with a first environment; determining an update to current values of the Q network parameters by minimizing a robust entropy-regularized temporal difference (TD) error that accounts for possible perturbations of the states of the first environment represented by the observations in the observation-action-reward tuples; and determining, using the Q-value neural network, an update to the policy network parameters using the sampled mini-batch of observation-action-reward tuples.