Robust Entropy-Regularized Reinforcement Learning Under Model Misspecification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Reinforcement learning agents trained in a single environment are sensitive to perturbations in the test environment, leading to sub-optimal performance when deployed in different real-world settings due to model misspecification, such as changes in lighting, sensor noise, and actuator noise.

Innovation Solution

A method of training a policy neural network using a robust entropy-regularized temporal difference error to account for potential perturbations, jointly with a Q-value neural network, to enhance the agent's robustness to environmental changes.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If reinforcement learning agents are trained in a single environment, then training simplicity is maintained, but performance robustness deteriorates when deployed in different real-world settings

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveperformance robustnessVSAvoidtraining complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by incorporating perturbation handling into the training phase. Specifically, the training process artificially introduces environmental perturbations (changes in lighting, sensor noise, actuator noise) before deployment, allowing the agent to pre-adapt to various conditions. This resolves the contradiction by building robustness in advance during training rather than requiring complex adaptive mechanisms during deployment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes parameter changes by systematically varying environmental parameters during training. The training environment dynamically adjusts parameters such as lighting conditions, sensor noise levels, and actuator characteristics to create diverse training scenarios. This exposes the agent to a range of conditions, improving performance robustness without requiring multiple separate training systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Measurement precision

If the training environment perfectly matches the test environment, then model accuracy is maximized, but adaptability to real-world variations deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel accuracyVSAvoidgeneralization capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by transforming the static training environment into a dynamic one that continuously varies environmental conditions. The training system introduces time-varying perturbations including lighting changes, sensor noise variations, and actuator inconsistencies. This dynamic training process teaches the agent to handle environmental variations while maintaining accurate policy learning, thus improving generalization without sacrificing model accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent uses an intermediary approach by introducing a perturbation layer between the agent and the environment. This intermediary component artificially generates environmental variations during training, acting as a mediator that bridges the gap between controlled training conditions and unpredictable real-world settings. The agent learns to compensate for these intermediate perturbations, improving its ability to generalize to unseen environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Data Source

PatentEP3948672B1Robust reinforcement learning for continuous control with model misspecification
Publication Date: 2025.08.06 GDM HOLDING LLC
  • EP3948672B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3948672B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3948672B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer programs encoded on computer storage media, for training a policy neural network having policy parameters. One of the methods includes sampling a mini-batch comprising one or more observation – action – reward tuples generated as a result of interactions of a first agent with a first environment; determining an update to current values of the Q network parameters by minimizing a robust entropy-regularized temporal difference (TD) error that accounts for possible perturbations of the states of the first environment represented by the observations in the observation – action – reward tuples; and determining, using the Q-value neural network, an update to the policy network parameters using the sampled mini-batch of observation – action – reward tuples.