Rock Cracker Cartridge Deflagration Ignition Safety

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rock cracker cartridges require detonating explosives for ignition, which poses safety risks during transportation and handling, and existing ignition systems do not meet the lowest Swedish classification for explosive transportation (class 1.4).

Innovation Solution

A rock cracker cartridge with an integrated ignition assembly that uses a non-explosive ignition capsule with an electrical igniter and deflagration combustion, housed within a thin-walled plastic sleeve with strength-reducing grooves, to ensure controlled explosion within a closed space, avoiding detonation and minimizing fragmentation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional detonating explosives are used for ignition, then reliable ignition of the rock cracker cartridge is achieved, but safety risks during transportation and handling increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition reliabilityVSAvoidsafety risks during transportation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The invention extracts the detonating explosive from the ignition system, replacing it with a deflagration-based ignition capsule. The ignition capsule contains only deflagrating composition and an electrical igniter, eliminating the need for detonating explosives while maintaining reliable ignition of the main charge.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention introduces a deflagrating composition as an intermediary between the electrical igniter and the main explosive charge. This intermediary substance burns with deflagration rather than detonating, providing a safe transition that initiates the main charge without requiring detonating explosives in the ignition system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If a thin-walled plastic sleeve is used for the ignition assembly, then transportation safety is improved, but structural strength is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransportation safetyVSAvoidsleeve structural strength
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The plastic sleeve incorporates localized weakness features in the form of circumferential grooves at specific locations. These grooves create controlled points of weakness that allow the sleeve to rupture in a predictable manner during deflagration, rather than requiring the entire sleeve to withstand high pressures. The sleeve maintains sufficient strength in non-grooved areas while having predetermined failure points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Device complexity

If an integrated ignition assembly is used, then device complexity is reduced, but manufacturing precision requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveignition system complexityVSAvoidassembly integration precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention merges the ignition capsule, electrical igniter, and plastic sleeve into a single integrated ignition assembly that is pre-assembled as one unit. This integrated assembly is then inserted as a single component into the rock cracker cartridge, simplifying the overall device while requiring precise manufacturing of the integrated unit itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution allows for safe transportation and handling of the rock cracker cartridge while effectively cracking boulders or rock sections without fragmenting them into hazardous pieces, meeting the lowest Swedish classification for explosive transportation and achieving controlled deflagration combustion.

Implementation Method 1

uses a non-explosive ignition capsule with an electrical igniter and deflagration combustion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeflagration combustion: Deflagration

Implementation Method 2

deflagration combustion

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCombustion: Combustion

Implementation Method 3

thin-walled plastic sleeve with strength-reducing grooves

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectStress concentration:

Data Source

PatentEP2531808B1Rock cracker cartridge and ignition capsule
Publication Date: 2016.04.20 BENGTSSON JAN AKE
  • EP2531808B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4
  • EP2531808B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7
  • EP2531808B1 patent drawingFigure 8~9

AI summary

A rock cracker cartridge (1) contains a cracking powder charge (6) and an ignition capsule (30) with an ignition powder charge (29) in an ignition unit sleeve (31) which does not possess the mechanical strength that would be required for the ignition powder charge to be exploded in the open air when ignited. In the rock cracker cartridge there is also provided an ignition assembly sleeve (7a) which surrounds the ignition unit sleeve when the rock cracker cartridge is primed. In combination, the assembly which surrounds the cracking powder charge, and which comprises the ignition unit sleeve and the ignition assembly sleeve, has a sufficient strength for an adequate pressure to be developed in the assembly such that the ignition powder charge will explode and generate a flame of fire and the ignition unit sleeve as well as the ignition assembly sleeve be penetrated by the pressure and the flame of fire, said flame offire igniting the cracking powder charge.