Multi-Mechanism Rock Joint Shear Tester for Scale Effects

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing direct shear test apparatuses for rock joints are limited by their inability to meet the requirements for accuracy across a large range of loads, making them unreliable for testing multi-scale rock joint samples effectively.

Innovation Solution

A tester comprising multiple mechanisms, including a horizontal loading mechanism, a vertical loading mechanism, and a sample installation and lifting table, with symmetrically distributed actuators and force transducers, allowing for precise control of loads and sample positioning to accommodate various scales and specifications of rock joint samples.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If a single loading system is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the measurement precision and reliability across a large range of loads cannot be met

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting accuracyVSAvoidloading system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The loading system is segmented into multiple independent loading mechanisms (first loading mechanism, second loading mechanism, third loading mechanism, fourth loading mechanism), each capable of operating within specific load ranges. This segmentation allows the system to maintain high measurement precision across the entire load spectrum by selecting the appropriate mechanism for each load level, while avoiding the need for a single overly complex system designed to handle all loads.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically selects and switches between different loading mechanisms based on the required load magnitude. The control system can adaptively choose which loading mechanism to activate, optimizing measurement precision for each specific test condition. This dynamic approach allows the system to maintain high reliability across varying load ranges without requiring all mechanisms to operate simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Adaptability or versatility

If multiple loading mechanisms are used, then the applicability to multi-scale samples is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveapplicability to multi-scale samplesVSAvoidmechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The testing apparatus is divided into multiple specialized loading mechanisms, each optimized for specific sample scales and load requirements. The first and second loading mechanisms handle different vertical load ranges, while the third and fourth loading mechanisms handle different horizontal shear load ranges. This segmentation enables the system to accommodate multi-scale rock joint samples effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Each loading mechanism is designed with universal applicability to handle different sample sizes within its designated range. The mechanisms can be selectively activated based on sample scale, making the overall system versatile for testing rock joint samples across multiple scales while maintaining a manageable complexity through functional specialization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Adaptability or versatility

If the load range is expanded, then the versatility of the tester is improved, but the measurement precision across the entire range deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload range coverageVSAvoidtesting accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The load range is segmented into multiple sub-ranges, each handled by a dedicated loading mechanism. The first and second loading mechanisms cover different vertical load sub-ranges, while the third and fourth loading mechanisms cover different horizontal shear load sub-ranges. This segmentation ensures that each mechanism operates within its optimal precision range, maintaining high measurement accuracy across the entire expanded load spectrum.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes operational parameters by selecting different loading mechanisms based on the required load magnitude. For small loads, mechanisms with higher precision are selected; for large loads, mechanisms designed for high capacity are selected. This parameter-based selection strategy allows the system to maintain optimal measurement precision across the full load range while achieving versatile load coverage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10197483B2Tester assembled by multiple sets of mechanisms for shear strength-scale effect of rock joint
Publication Date: 2019.02.05 SHAOXING UNIVERSITY
  • US10197483B2 patent drawing
  • US10197483B2 patent drawing
  • US10197483B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A tester assembled by multiple sets of mechanisms for shear strength-scale effect of a rock joint includes a horizontal loading mechanism, a horizontal supporting and force-measuring mechanism and a sample installation and lifting table are mounted on a platform on the bottom of a frame, the horizontal loading mechanism and the horizontal supporting and force-measuring mechanism are respectively located on two sides of the sample installation and lifting table; rock joint sample is divided into an upper portion and a lower portion by a slit, the horizontal loading mechanism is configured to load the upper portion of the multi-scale rock joint sample, and the horizontal supporting and force-measuring mechanism is configured to support the lower portion of the multi-scale rock joint sample; a vertical loading mechanism is located above the multi-scale rock joint sample, and can be mounted on the frame in a manner of being movable up and down; and the horizontal loading mechanism comprises at least two tangential actuators, and the vertical loading mechanism comprises a vertical actuator group including at least two vertical actuators. The present invention effectively meets the test requirements on the scale of the multi-scale rock joint samples under large-range loads, and is good in reliability.