Rocket Engine Actuator Control via Bang-Bang Inhibition

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current servocontrol systems for engine actuators, such as those in rocket engines, require costly high-bandwidth and high-electrical-power electronics for effective control, leading to unnecessary energy consumption and complex electronics due to the need for precise and rapid actuation.

Innovation Solution

Implementing slow actuators controlled in bang-bang mode with non-linear control strategies that include an inhibition module and duration quantization to generate commands, reducing the need for complex electronics and minimizing unnecessary oscillations near the operating point.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Speed

If high-bandwidth and high-electrical-power electronics are used for servocontrol of actuators, then effective control with extremely short transient is achieved, but energy consumption increases and device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator response speedVSAvoidelectrical power consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements bang-bang control with periodic pulse commands instead of continuous high-bandwidth control signals. The actuator is activated in discrete on/off pulses only when the error exceeds the dead zone threshold, converting continuous high-power control into periodic low-power actuation while maintaining effective control performance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and eliminates the continuous high-power electronics control loop by replacing it with simple threshold-based bang-bang control. The complex servocontrol electronics are removed entirely, keeping only the essential actuation function while discarding the energy-intensive continuous control mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Measurement precision

If continuous servocontrol is implemented to maintain actuator position relative to setpoint, then precise control is achieved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveactuator position control precisionVSAvoidcontrol electronics complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces expensive, complex continuous control electronics with simple, inexpensive threshold comparison and pulse generation logic. The control system uses basic dead zone detection and bang-bang pulse generation instead of sophisticated servocontrol circuits, achieving adequate precision at fraction of the cost and complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the control range into distinct zones: a dead zone where no control action is taken, and outer zones where bang-bang control is applied. This segmentation allows the system to avoid complex continuous control in the critical mid-range while maintaining simplicity through discrete control regions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Device complexity

If slow actuators are used instead of high-bandwidth actuators, then device complexity and energy consumption decrease, but control effectiveness with short transient response deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol electronics complexityVSAvoidcontrol response effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by accumulating error beyond the dead zone threshold before triggering actuator activation. This allows slow actuators to catch up with the accumulated error through sustained pulse application, compensating for their slower response while maintaining overall control effectiveness without requiring high-bandwidth components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentEP2187031B1Control system for a process factor of a rocket engine
Publication Date: 2012.04.04 SN DETUDE & DE CONSTR DE MOTEURS DAVIATION (S N E C M A)
  • EP2187031B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2187031B1 patent drawingFigure 2~4
  • EP2187031B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

The device (105) has a subtractor (10) for calculating an error obtained from a difference between a measurement of a variable (PC) and a set point (PCc). A command generating unit (20) generates a bang-bang type command to be applied to an actuator (VR1) i.e. slow actuator, from the error. A sending unit (30) sends of the command to the actuator. An inhibitor (INH) is placed in an upstream of the command generating unit to inhibit the error when the error lies within in a given range (ZM). A quantifier (QD) quantifies a duration of the command. Independent claims are also included for the following: (1) an engine comprising an adjustment device (2) a method for adjusting an operating variable of an engine according to an set point (3) a computer program having a set of instructions for executing an engine operating variable adjusting method (4) a computer readable storage medium for storing a computer program to implement the engine operating variable adjusting method.