Rocket Engine Fault Detection Using Hierarchical Confidence Levels

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current fault detection systems for complex systems, such as rocket engines, rely on majority logic approaches that are inadequate for handling diverse and severe malfunctions, often leading to untimely shutdowns and inadequate responses due to lack of confidence and severity consideration.

Innovation Solution

A fault detection and location system that uses sensors, validation modules, fault detection modules, data fusion modules, and decision-making modules to generate confidence-level messages, allowing for precise diagnosis and adaptive action based on severity and reliability, incorporating fuzzy logic for nuanced decision-making.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If majority logic approach is used for fault detection, then system complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and reliability of fault diagnosis deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem complexityVSAvoidfault diagnosis precision
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The fault detection system is segmented into multiple hierarchical levels: sensor level (first order confidence), component level (second order confidence), and system level (third order confidence). Each level processes fault information independently and contributes to the overall diagnosis, allowing precise fault localization without requiring complex global analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a new dimension for fault analysis by incorporating confidence levels (first order, second order, third order) that represent different hierarchical levels of the system. This multi-dimensional approach allows the system to evaluate faults not just by presence/absence but by their reliability and hierarchical context, significantly improving diagnostic precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Loss of time

If majority logic approach is used for fault detection, then response time is reduced, but reliability of action decision deteriorates due to lack of confidence and severity consideration

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresponse timeVSAvoidaction decision reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of faults by assigning confidence levels (first order from sensors, second order from components, third order from system level) before making final decisions. This preliminary assessment of fault reliability allows the system to prepare appropriate responses in advance, reducing response time while maintaining high decision reliability through structured confidence evaluation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation from binary fault detection to multi-level confidence assessment. By transforming fault information into graded confidence levels (first order, second order, third order) and combining them with severity parameters, the system achieves both rapid response and reliable decision-making through enriched parameter analysis.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If confidence levels and severity considerations are added to fault detection, then action decision reliability is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaction decision reliabilityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The complex task of reliable fault diagnosis is segmented into three manageable confidence levels: first order (sensor validation), second order (component fault detection), and third order (system-level data fusion). Each segment handles a specific aspect of confidence assessment, making the overall complex system more manageable and implementable while achieving high decision reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds the dimension of hierarchical confidence levels (first order, second order, third order) to the fault detection process. This dimensional expansion allows the system to capture multiple aspects of fault reliability without requiring exponentially complex processing, as each level builds upon the previous one in a structured hierarchy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Data Source

PatentEP2539786B1System for detecting and locating engine breakdowns and engine comprising such a system
Publication Date: 2015.04.08 SN DETUDE & DE CONSTR DE MOTEURS DAVIATION (S N E C M A)
  • EP2539786B1 patent drawingFigure 1~8
  • EP2539786B1 patent drawingFigure 4
  • EP2539786B1 patent drawingFigure 5A~6B

AI summary

The invention relates to a system for detecting and locating breakdowns that can occur in a complex system, comprising: means (CAP, MODVAL,MODDP, MODFD,) for detecting and locating a breakdown affecting at least one subsystem of the complex system; and means (MODPD) for making a decision regarding possible action to be taken in the event of such a detection. Said system is of use in monitoring a rocket engine.