Automated Rodent Vocalization Classification Using Ultrasonic Sensors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for analyzing rodent vocalizations and their association with behaviors in vivarium settings are limited by periodic monitoring and reliance on human observation, which are not comprehensive or accurate, especially in understanding ultrasonic vocalizations and their relationship to phenotypes and behaviors.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of continuous data recording using ultrasonic audio sensors and video cameras in rodents' natural environments, with automated analysis by algorithms to identify patterns, classify vocalizations as 'positive' or 'negative', and associate them with video behaviors, phenotypes, and cognitive states, allowing for real-time or delayed analysis without disturbing the animals.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If periodic monitoring and human observation are used to analyze rodent vocalizations, then device complexity is reduced, but measurement precision and reliability deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemonitoring system complexityVSAvoidvocalization analysis accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual human observation and periodic mechanical monitoring with automated electronic detection systems including ultrasonic microphones, video cameras, and algorithmic analysis. This substitution enables continuous, precise detection of ultrasonic vocalizations and behavioral patterns without human intervention, resolving the contradiction between system complexity and measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements self-service through automated algorithms that independently analyze vocalization data, video footage, and sensor information. The algorithms automatically classify behaviors, detect patterns, and generate results without requiring human observation or interpretation, thereby improving precision while maintaining manageable complexity through automation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Measurement precision

If continuous data recording with multiple sensors is implemented, then measurement precision and comprehensiveness improve, but device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebehavioral analysis accuracyVSAvoidsensor system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs multi-functional sensors and processing units that simultaneously perform multiple tasks. For example, the system records ultrasonic vocalizations, visible light video, infrared thermal data, and sensor information using integrated components that handle diverse data types through unified processing pipelines, reducing overall system complexity despite the comprehensive monitoring capability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The complex data processing task is segmented into specialized algorithms for different data types: vocalization analysis algorithms, behavior classification algorithms, and pattern recognition algorithms. Each segment handles specific aspects of the data independently, making the overall complex system more manageable and easier to implement while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If automated algorithmic analysis is used to classify vocalizations and behaviors, then productivity and measurement precision improve, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata analysis throughputVSAvoidalgorithm processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and organizing raw data from sensors before main analysis. Vocalizations are pre-segmented, video footage is pre-tagged with temporal markers, and sensor data is pre-filtered, which simplifies subsequent classification tasks and improves overall processing productivity while managing complexity through staged processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The algorithmic system incorporates feedback mechanisms where classification results are continuously refined based on pattern recognition and comparison with known behavioral datasets. This feedback loop improves measurement precision and productivity by automatically learning from data patterns, while the iterative nature of the process manages complexity through progressive refinement rather than requiring all complexity upfront.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10806129B2Device and method of automatic classification of animal behaviors using vocalizations
Publication Date: 2020.10.20 VIUM ABC LLC
  • US10806129B2 patent drawing
  • US10806129B2 patent drawing
  • US10806129B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The field of this invention is classifying animal behaviors. In particular the fields of this invention include using animals in vivariums, such as rodents, particularly mice. Animal behaviors are classified according to behaviors consistent with healthy or unhealthy organs or locations within organs, such as the brain. Injected neoplastic cells may be used to create an unhealthy organ or location within an organ. Classifications also include responses to different therapies. The behavior of the animals is observed using fully automatic, continuous monitoring using per-cage ultrasonic and video sensors, where behavior recording is free of human, manual actions. Observed behavior is consistent with healthy or unhealthy behaviors specific to the injection site. Both positive and negative baseline behaviors are collected, typically using the same system or method. Classification is responsive to differences between treated and untreated animals, comparing to both the positive and negative baselines, using multi-dimensional analysis.