Imaging System Exposure Control via Region of Interest Masking

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional exposure control methods for imaging systems in vehicle environments are inefficient due to high processing power requirements, high costs, and inability to effectively handle extreme lighting variations, often resulting in ineffective exposure control.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that capture images, define a region of interest, analyze brightness within this region, calculate and adjust exposure time based on the analyzed brightness, using a controller and image processor to optimize exposure settings, thereby reducing processing power and improving adaptability to varying lighting conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If sophisticated histogram-based operations are used for exposure control, then exposure accuracy is improved, but processing time increases and the system becomes too slow for dynamic occupant sensing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexposure accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the image into multiple regions of interest (ROIs) and performs exposure analysis separately on each ROI rather than processing the entire image. This segmentation allows the system to focus computational resources on critical areas, reducing overall processing time while maintaining exposure accuracy for occupant detection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts only the necessary brightness information from specific regions of interest rather than performing comprehensive histogram analysis on the entire image. By taking out only the essential exposure data from key ROIs, the system achieves adequate exposure control with significantly reduced computational complexity and processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Speed

If special hardware designs are used to avert complex algorithms, then processing speed is improved, but cost and complexity of camera components increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidcamera component complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces complex hardware-based exposure control mechanisms with a simplified software algorithm that analyzes brightness in regions of interest. This substitution achieves fast processing speeds through efficient computational methods rather than through complex hardware designs, thereby reducing camera component complexity and cost while maintaining processing speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If light-intensity detectors are integrated with the camera system, then exposure control accuracy is improved, but cost and device complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveexposure control accuracyVSAvoidcamera system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent enables the camera system to perform its own exposure control by utilizing the image data already captured by the sensor. The system analyzes brightness within regions of interest from the captured images and uses this information to adjust exposure parameters, eliminating the need for separate light-intensity detectors while maintaining exposure control accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

4Device complexity

If global exposure control is used, then system simplicity is maintained, but effectiveness deteriorates under extreme intensity variations in the background

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidexposure control effectiveness
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies different exposure analysis strategies to different regions of the image by defining specific regions of interest. Instead of uniform global exposure control, the system focuses on analyzing brightness in critical ROIs where occupant information is located, while ignoring or giving less weight to background regions with extreme intensity variations. This local quality approach maintains system simplicity while significantly improving exposure control effectiveness under varying lighting conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP1763227B1Method of exposure control for an imaging system
Publication Date: 2015.03.25 DELPHI TECHNOLOGIES INC
  • EP1763227B1 patent drawingFigure 1~4
  • EP1763227B1 patent drawingFigure 2~5
  • EP1763227B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

A method (200) of exposure control for an imaging system (10). A predetermined number of images are captured (202) by one or more imagers (18), wherein the images are defined by an image resolution matrix. The images are masked (208) to establish a region of interest within the image resolution matrix and brightness of the images is analyzed (210) within the region of interest. An exposure time is calculated (228) for a subsequent image capturing step based on the brightness analysis, and an exposure time setting of the imager(s) is adjusted (230) during the subsequent image capturing step based on the calculated exposure time.