Image Item Identification Using Region-of-Interest Feature Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current technologies lack an efficient method to identify specific items within images by comparing features of the items to regions-of-interest (ROIs) in a way that accurately retrieves images depicting the item, especially in varying contexts and depths.

Innovation Solution

The use of a trained convolutional neural network or Siamese network to compare features of items with defined ROIs in images, calculating ROI sizes based on item size and image depth, and filtering regions by color similarity before feature comparison.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If feature comparison is performed across entire images, then item identification completeness is improved, but processing time and computational complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem identification completenessVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the image into multiple regions-of-interest (ROIs) based on spatial location and object characteristics. Instead of comparing features across the entire image, the system performs feature comparison only within these segmented regions, significantly reducing computational complexity while maintaining identification accuracy for specific items like clothing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different processing strategies to different regions of the image based on their characteristics. ROIs are selected and processed with appropriate feature comparison methods tailored to their specific properties (e.g., color histograms for clothing items), improving efficiency without sacrificing identification reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If ROI size is increased to capture more context, then item identification accuracy is improved, but false positive rate increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem identification accuracyVSAvoidfalse positive rate
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically adjusts ROI size and position based on the specific item being searched for and the image characteristics. The system optimizes ROI parameters to capture sufficient context for accurate identification while minimizing inclusion of irrelevant regions that could cause false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent modifies ROI parameters (size, position, shape) based on the search query and image analysis results. By changing these parameters adaptively, the system achieves optimal balance between capturing enough context for accurate identification and avoiding irrelevant regions that lead to false positives.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple ROIs are analyzed per image, then item identification reliability is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveitem identification reliabilityVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the image into multiple ROIs and applies feature comparison to each region. This segmentation allows parallel processing of different regions, improving reliability through comprehensive coverage while managing computational complexity through efficient region selection and processing strategies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent analyzes multiple ROIs per image, performing more comparisons than a single-region approach. This partial or excessive action across multiple regions improves identification reliability by reducing false negatives, while the system manages the increased computational load through efficient algorithms and selective ROI processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10007860B1Identifying items in images using regions-of-interest
Publication Date: 2018.06.26 AMAZON TECH INC
  • US10007860B1 patent drawing
  • US10007860B1 patent drawing
  • US10007860B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The techniques described herein may identify images that likely depict one or more items by comparing features of the items to features of different regions-of-interest (ROIs) of the images. For instance, some of the images may include a user, and the techniques may define multiple regions within the image corresponding to different portions of the user. The techniques may then use a trained convolutional neural network or any other type of trained classifier to determine, for each region of the image, whether the region depicts a particular item. If so, the techniques may designate the corresponding image as depicting the item and may output an indication that the image depicts the item. The techniques may perform this process for multiple images, outputting an indication of each image deemed to depict the particular item.