Automated Region of Interest Matching in Serial Medical Images

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for evaluating tumor progression in serial medical images are manual, time-consuming, and prone to errors, especially when dealing with multiple objects of interest, such as metastases and tumor recurrence, lacking fully automated object matching across longitudinal image sets.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method determines the correspondence between regions of interest in different medical images by calculating the overlap ratio between image representations and applying a threshold to establish matching, using image registration and volume correlation algorithms to map and compare anatomical body parts across images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If manual evaluation methods are used to assess tumor progression in serial medical images, then clinical expertise can be applied to interpret data, but the process becomes very time-consuming and error-prone especially for large patient pools

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of tumor progression evaluationVSAvoidtime consumption for manual data collection and enrichment
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automated self-evaluation of tumor progression by having the computer automatically collect, match, and analyze serial medical images and associated data, replacing manual clinical evaluation with autonomous computational processes that maintain accuracy while dramatically reducing time consumption

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the manual mechanical process of clinical evaluation with automated computational methods including image registration algorithms, object matching algorithms, and data enrichment systems that process medical images and extract tumor progression information without human intervention

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Measurement precision

If manual collection and enrichment of patient data is performed for clinical research, then data accuracy can be maintained, but the process is very time-consuming in particular for large pool of patients

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccuracy of patient dataVSAvoidefficiency of data collection and enrichment
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs data collection and enrichment tasks by having the computer retrieve serial medical images, match regions of interest across images, extract tumor characteristics, and compile research data without requiring manual data entry or processing, thereby maintaining precision while dramatically improving productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system creates and processes digital copies of medical images and patient data through automated workflows, using image registration and object matching algorithms to replicate and analyze tumor regions across multiple serial images, enabling efficient large-scale data processing while maintaining data accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #26Copying

3Productivity

If automated object matching algorithms are implemented across longitudinal image sets, then time consumption and human error are reduced, but the system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveefficiency of object matching across serial imagesVSAvoidcomplexity of automated matching system
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the complex task of tumor progression analysis into distinct automated components: image registration module, object matching module, data extraction module, and data enrichment module, allowing each component to be optimized independently while working together to solve the overall problem efficiently

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses parameter-based approaches including threshold values for object matching, registration parameters for image alignment, and configurable criteria for tumor identification, allowing the complex automated system to be tuned and optimized for different clinical scenarios while maintaining high productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11501442B2Comparison of a region of interest along a time series of images
Publication Date: 2022.11.15 SNKE OS GMBH
  • US11501442B2 patent drawing
  • US11501442B2 patent drawing
  • US11501442B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Disclosed is a computer-implemented method of determining a correspondence between a region of interest as it appears in a first digital medical patient image and as it appears in a second digital medical image. The correspondence is determined by calculating the ratio of overlap of the region of interest with a data object defining an anatomical body part in the first image and the second image and determining whether the larger of the two ratios exceeds a threshold. If the threshold is exceeded, the method assumes that the appearances in the two images describe the same region of interest.