ROI Estimation for Property Renovation Using ML

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Property investors face challenges in accurately estimating return on investment for property renovations due to difficulties in estimating renovation costs and market prices post-renovation, largely because of sparse data and inconsistent manual estimations.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning system that identifies renovation projects, adjusts property prices using a price index, determines comparable property groups, calculates renovation costs, and computes return on investment (ROI), while avoiding extreme values by aggregating data at different zip code levels to compensate for data sparsity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual estimation of renovation cost is performed, then flexibility in estimation is maintained, but consistency and accuracy deteriorate across different properties and time

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflexibility in estimationVSAvoidconsistency and accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables self-service by automatically gathering renovation cost data from multiple sources (job sites, permits, insurance claims, etc.) and using machine learning models to generate estimates without requiring manual input from experts for each property, thus maintaining flexibility while improving consistency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameters of estimation by transitioning from subjective manual judgment to objective data-driven models that incorporate multiple variables (property characteristics, location, renovation scope, market conditions) to generate consistent and accurate cost estimates across different properties and time periods

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Quantity of substance

If data aggregation at broader geographic levels is used, then data sparsity is compensated, but local market specificity is lost

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata availabilityVSAvoidlocal market accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Quantity of substanceVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the geographic market into multiple hierarchical levels (e.g., zip code, county, state, national) and applies different aggregation levels to different properties based on data availability and local market characteristics, allowing simultaneous use of both local specificity and broader data coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system adds temporal dimension to the geographic aggregation by using time-series data and comparing current market conditions with historical data at multiple geographic levels, enabling the model to compensate for local data sparsity while maintaining sensitivity to local market dynamics through multi-dimensional analysis

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If comprehensive property characteristics are considered for comparable property grouping, then estimation accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveestimation accuracyVSAvoidcomputational complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary actions by pre-processing and standardizing property characteristic data during data ingestion, creating normalized feature representations and pre-computing similarity metrics that can be efficiently queried during estimation without requiring complex real-time computations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces complex mechanical comparison processes with machine learning models that use dimensionality reduction techniques and similarity algorithms to efficiently match properties based on multiple characteristics simultaneously, reducing computational complexity while maintaining or improving accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20230281720A1Machine Learning Systems and Methods for Return on Investment Determinations from Sparse Data
Publication Date: 2023.09.07 XACTWARE SOLUTIONS
  • US20230281720A1 patent drawing
  • US20230281720A1 patent drawing
  • US20230281720A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Machine learning systems and methods for return on investment determinations from sparse data are provided. The system identifies one or more renovation projects of one or more properties, adjusts a property price for each of the one or more properties based at least in part on a price index, determines a group of properties with similar property characteristics using one or more trained machine learning models, calculates a price difference between each of the one or more properties after renovation and a similar property without renovation of the group of properties, and calculates cost of the one or more renovation projects. The system then calculates a return on investment (ROI) associated with each of the one or more properties.