Image Pre-Processing with ROI Visibility Selection for HDR Frame Rates

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High frame rate image processing is prohibitively expensive due to the need for complex and costly image processing systems, especially when combined with High Dynamic Range (HDR) techniques that require computationally intense image synthesis.

Innovation Solution

An image pre-processing method that identifies regions of interest, performs visibility measures, and selects a subset of images based on these measures to feed into an image processing pipeline at a lower frame rate, reducing processing power requirements and leveraging image redundancy to select higher quality images.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high frame rate image processing is performed, then image quality and temporal resolution are improved, but system cost and processing complexity increase prohibitively

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveframe rateVSAvoidprocessing system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary actions by capturing multiple images at high frame rate with different exposure times before actual processing occurs. These pre-captured images are then evaluated using visibility measures to select only the most suitable ones for HDR processing, reducing the computational burden while maintaining high temporal resolution

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by performing visibility measures specifically on regions of interest (such as specular highlights in eye images) rather than processing entire images uniformly. This selective approach focuses computational resources on critical areas, reducing overall processing complexity while preserving image quality where it matters most

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Measurement precision

If HDR image synthesis is performed on every captured image, then dynamic range is maximized, but processing time and computational power increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveluminance range accuracyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes parameters by varying exposure times across multiple captured images and using visibility measures to evaluate image quality. By adjusting exposure parameters and selectively processing only high-quality images, the system maximizes luminance range accuracy while minimizing processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by performing HDR synthesis only on a selected subset of images that meet visibility criteria, rather than processing every captured image. This selective approach processes fewer images (excessive action on quality, partial on quantity) while maintaining overall dynamic range accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Measurement precision

If complex image synthesising techniques are applied to maximise luminance range, then HDR quality is improved, but processing cost and system complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveluminance representation accuracyVSAvoidsystem implementation cost
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary visibility assessment on captured images before applying complex HDR synthesis techniques. By pre-evaluating images using computationally simple visibility measures, the system identifies which images are suitable for expensive HDR processing, reducing overall system implementation cost while maintaining luminance representation accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces visibility measures as an intermediary step between image capture and HDR synthesis. This intermediary evaluation layer filters images based on quality criteria, allowing complex HDR processing to be applied only when necessary, thereby reducing system complexity and implementation cost

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Speed

If real-time processing of high frame rate images is performed, then temporal resolution is maintained, but processing power requirements become prohibitive

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidprocessing power requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSPower

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts and processes only the most relevant images from the high frame rate sequence by applying visibility measures. By taking out only the high-quality images that meet selection criteria for further processing, the system maintains temporal resolution for critical moments while dramatically reducing processing power requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Data Source

PatentUS12198312B2High frame rate image pre-processing system and method
Publication Date: 2025.01.14 SEEING MACHINES
  • US12198312B2 patent drawing
  • US12198312B2 patent drawing
  • US12198312B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Described herein is an image pre-processing system and method. One embodiment provides a method (500) including: at step (501), receiving a plurality of images captured at a first frame rate, the plurality of images captured under at least two different image conditions; pre-processing the plurality of images by: at step (502) identifying one or more regions of interest within the images; at step (503), performing a visibility measure on the one or more regions of interest; and, at step (504), selecting a subset of the plurality of images based on the visibility measure; and, at step (505), feeding the subset of images to an image processing pipeline for subsequent processing at a second frame rate that is lower than the first frame rate.