Metallic Part Roll Formability Classification and Forming Direction

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Roll forming processes are limited to parts with uniform sections, and existing methods lack a systematic approach to determine the roll formability of metallic parts and their optimal forming direction, hindering the efficient application of this high-productivity technique.

Innovation Solution

A computerized method using finite element mesh analysis, singular value decomposition, and Gaussian probability distribution curves to determine the roll formability index and direction, enabling classification of parts as roll-formable without, with, or not roll-formable, and optimizing the roll forming process for various parts, including automotive components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If roll forming is applied to parts with non-uniform cross sections, then the productivity and energy efficiency advantages of roll forming can be utilized, but the part cannot be manufactured by roll forming due to geometric constraints

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveproductivityVSAvoidroll formability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by performing computational analysis (singular value decomposition) before the actual roll forming process to determine whether a part with non-uniform cross-section can be manufactured by roll forming. This pre-assessment allows planners to identify suitable parts and optimize forming directions before committing to production, enabling the use of roll forming for previously unsuitable geometries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If roll forming is used for high strength metals, then parts with high strength and tight geometrical tolerances can be produced, but the process can only be applied to parts with uniform sections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvegeometrical tolerancesVSAvoidpart geometry flexibility
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by introducing a computational parameter (roll formability index derived from singular value decomposition) that quantifies the suitability of non-uniform parts for roll forming. This mathematical parameter transforms the assessment from a qualitative geometric constraint check to a quantitative evaluation, allowing parts with controlled non-uniformities to be included in the roll forming process while maintaining high geometrical tolerances.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If a systematic method for determining roll formability is implemented, then the appropriate forming direction and suitability can be determined, but additional computational steps are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveroll formability determination accuracyVSAvoidcomputational method complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces manual or empirical assessment methods with an automated computational system based on singular value decomposition. This substitution of mechanical/experiential evaluation with mathematical computation provides reliable and consistent determination of roll formability and optimal forming direction, eliminating subjectivity while the algorithmic nature of SVD keeps the implementation manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Data Source

PatentUS20240320397A1Method to classify, design and manufacture a metallic part
Publication Date: 2024.09.26 ARCELORMITTAL SA
  • US20240320397A1 patent drawing
  • US20240320397A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A computerized method to determine the aptitude of a metallic part to be manufactured by roll forming and to classify metallic parts into one of the following categories: roll-formable without modification, roll-formable with modifications, not roll-formable. It also provides for a computerized method to compute the roll forming direction of a part. It further provides a method for determining the aptitude to roll forming of a large set of parts, such as for example part of the set of parts making up an automotive vehicle. The purpose of the current invention is further to provide a manufacturing method for a metallic part.