Roll Forming Dies for Variable Cross-Section Steel

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current roll forming methods are inadequate for producing shaped steel with varying cross-sectional shapes in the longitudinal direction, particularly with high tensile steel, due to complexity and stiffness issues, and require costly new facilities.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus using synchronized first and second rolling dies with annular ridge and groove parts of varying cross-sectional shapes, where the side surfaces of the ridge part are relieved to maintain a consistent gap with the groove part, allowing for the production of shaped steel with varying cross-sectional shapes without complex control systems and enabling sufficient material contact.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Shape

If press forming is used to produce shaped steel with varying cross-sectional shape, then the cross-sectional shape can be formed, but springback occurs and high tensile steel cannot be properly formed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecross-sectional shapeVSAvoidspringback control
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The invention transitions from static press forming to dynamic roll forming, where continuous rotation of rolling dies provides progressive deformation. This dynamic process allows the material to be gradually shaped through multiple contact points, preventing springback while accommodating high tensile steel properties

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The shaping process is divided into multiple sequential stages as the strip steel passes through successively arranged rolling dies. Each die performs a portion of the total deformation, distributing the forming action across multiple segments rather than applying it all at once, which prevents springback

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Productivity

If conventional roll forming is used, then constant cross-sectional shapes can be produced efficiently, but varying cross-sectional shapes cannot be formed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemass production efficiencyVSAvoidcross-sectional shape variation
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The rolling dies are designed with variable cross-sectional profiles along their circumferential direction, allowing them to dynamically adapt to different shape requirements while maintaining continuous rotation. This enables mass production of varying cross-sectional shapes without sacrificing productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Different portions of the rolling die circumference have different profiles, allowing each local region of the die to perform a specific shaping function. This local differentiation enables the production of varying cross-sectional shapes while maintaining continuous operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

3Adaptability or versatility

If split rolls with variable roll widths are used, then varying cross-sectional shapes can be produced, but apparatus complexity and control complexity increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevarying cross-sectional shape productionVSAvoidapparatus structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The invention combines the shaping function and the varying profile function into a single integrated rolling die structure. The annular ridge and groove parts are merged into one component that performs both functions simultaneously, eliminating the need for separate width-adjustment mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

4Adaptability or versatility

If split rolls with variable roll widths are used, then varying cross-sectional shapes can be produced, but control complexity increases significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvevarying cross-sectional shape productionVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSExtent of automation

Solution Approach 1:

The rolling dies are designed to automatically produce the desired varying cross-sectional shapes through their inherent geometry. The synchronized rotation of the annular ridge and groove parts self-generates the shape variation without requiring external control signals or active adjustment mechanisms

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

5Shape

If broadening roll widths of split rolls is used, then corner parts contact the material, but mill stiffness becomes insufficient for high tensile steel

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecorner part formationVSAvoidmill stiffness
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention adds a circumferential dimension to the rolling die profile, creating annular ridge and groove parts that vary in cross-section around the circumference. This dimensional change allows corner formation without requiring excessive roll width, maintaining mill stiffness

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies the roll forming process, eliminates the need for complex control systems, and ensures sufficient contact between roll barrel parts and material, effectively suppressing mill stiffness insufficiency, even with high tensile steel, allowing for efficient production of shaped steel with varying cross-sectional shapes.

Implementation Method 1

a gap which is equal to a thickness of the sheet is formed between the first rolling die and second rolling die and the annular ridge part of the first rolling die and the annular groove part of the second rolling die engage

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentUS9452459B2Method for manufacturing shaped steel the cross-sectional shape of which changes in the longitudinal direction, and roll forming device
Publication Date: 2016.09.27 NIPPON STEEL CORPORATION
  • US9452459B2 patent drawing
  • US9452459B2 patent drawing
  • US9452459B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A roll forming device, for roll forming for the purpose of manufacturing shaped steel the cross-sectional shape of which varies in the longitudinal direction, is equipped with: first die rolls having an annular ridge part the cross-sectional shape of which varies in the circumferential direction; second die rolls having an annular groove part the cross-sectional shape of which varies in the circumferential direction; and a drive device for the first die rolls and the second die rolls. A gap is provided at the side surfaces of the annular ridge part of the first die rolls, across the entire circumference in the circumferential direction, such that the gap with respect to the side surfaces of the annual groove parts of the second die rolls widens inward in the radial direction.