Roll-to-roll Image Forming Controller Error Handling

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In roll-to-roll image forming apparatuses, real-time adjustments often result in frequent suspension of printing jobs due to adjustment errors, leading to the generation of blank regions in the final product, which decreases production efficiency and requires manual handling.

Innovation Solution

The apparatus incorporates a controller with a real-time adjustment function that prints an adjustment image, reads the results, and adjusts image forming conditions, along with an error-time operation determination function that decides whether to stop or continue the printing job based on the occurrence situation of adjustment errors, minimizing unnecessary stops and blank regions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If real-time adjustment is applied in roll-to-roll image forming apparatus, then image quality is improved, but printing job suspension frequency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidprinting job suspension frequency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the operational parameters by introducing dynamic thresholds for adjustment errors. Instead of using a fixed threshold, the system adapts the threshold based on the timing of error detection during the printing job (initial phase vs. steady state), allowing more flexibility in what constitutes a stopping condition and reducing unnecessary suspensions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic error handling by making the stopping decision adaptive rather than static. The control unit evaluates the timing context of adjustment errors and dynamically adjusts the response strategy, transitioning from a rigid stop-on-error approach to a context-aware decision-making system that maintains productivity while ensuring quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Manufacturing precision

If printing job is stopped frequently due to adjustment errors, then image quality is maintained, but production efficiency decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidproduction efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent modifies the error evaluation parameters by introducing time-based weighting. Adjustment errors detected during the initial phase of printing are treated differently from those detected during steady-state operation, with the latter having higher thresholds and less likely to trigger stops, thereby reducing time loss while maintaining quality standards

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary tolerance by allowing certain adjustment errors to occur without triggering a stop, based on the understanding that minor variations are normal during operation. The system preemptively accepts a certain level of variation during steady-state printing, reserving stops only for significant quality deviations

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Manufacturing precision

If adjustment error threshold is set low, then image quality is ensured, but unnecessary stops increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimage qualityVSAvoidunnecessary stops
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent dynamically changes the error threshold parameter based on the printing job phase. During the initial phase, a lower threshold ensures quality establishment, while during steady-state operation, the threshold is raised to accommodate normal variations, thereby reducing unnecessary stops while maintaining quality assurance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach minimizes the frequency of printing job suspensions and reduces the formation of blank regions in the final product, enhancing production efficiency by allowing continued printing when errors are temporary or minor.

Implementation Method 1

an image former that includes an image bearing member carrying toner and that prints an image on a roll sheet, the image being formed by exposure of and development processing on the image bearing member

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotography: Photography

Implementation Method 2

an image reader that reads the image formed on the roll sheet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS12175139B2Image forming apparatus, control method for controlling image forming apparatus, and non-transitory computer-readable storage medium storing control program for image forming apparatus
Publication Date: 2024.12.24 KONICA MINOLTA INC
  • US12175139B2 patent drawing
  • US12175139B2 patent drawing
  • US12175139B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An image forming apparatus of a roll-to-roll type includes a hardware processor that functions as a controller. The controller has a real-time adjustment function of printing an adjustment image on a roll sheet, acquiring a reading result of reading the adjustment image from an image reading section, and adjusting an image forming condition in an image forming section in real time based on the reading result during execution of a printing job, and an error-time operation determination function of determining whether to stop or continue the printing job, when an adjustment error in the real-time adjustment function is detected, the determining being based on an occurrence situation of the adjustment error.