Roll-to-roll Fabricated Micro-pump with Releasable Valves

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) manufacturing methods are inefficient and costly for producing micro-pumps with releasable and moveable features, as they require complex and resource-intensive processes.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of roll-to-roll (R2R) fabrication techniques to pattern and laminate flexible plastic sheets with metal coatings, creating composite structures with releasable and moveable elements like T-shaped and Omega-shaped valve members, which are then stacked and diced into individual micro-pump components.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If traditional MEMS manufacturing methods are used, then manufacturing precision can be maintained, but productivity is low and manufacturing cost is high

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveproduction efficiencyVSAvoidmanufacturing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The device is divided into multiple layers (first flexible layer with inlet valve, second flexible layer with outlet valve, rigid body layer) that can be independently fabricated and then assembled. This segmentation allows parallel processing of different layers, improving productivity while maintaining manufacturing precision through specialized processing for each layer type.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The flexible plastic layers serve multiple functions: they form the structural body of the micro-pump, contain the valves, provide fluid channels, and enable mechanical movement. This multi-functionality reduces the number of separate components needed, simplifying manufacturing while maintaining device performance.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Manufacturing precision

If complex patterning processes are used to create moveable features, then manufacturing precision is maintained, but loss of time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefeature accuracyVSAvoidfabrication time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The metal coating is applied to the flexible layers before the valve features are patterned. This preliminary action allows the metal to serve as a sacrificial release agent during subsequent processing, enabling easy release of moveable valves from molds without requiring complex real-time patterning operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The metal coating layer acts as an intermediary between the flexible plastic layer and the molding process. It facilitates the release of patterned features from molds during fabrication and enables precise feature formation without direct complex patterning of the plastic itself.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Strength

If metal coatings are applied to flexible layers, then strength of moveable features is improved, but use of energy increases due to additional deposition processes

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical propertyVSAvoidpower consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The metal coating is applied selectively only to specific regions of the flexible layers where valve features and moveable elements will be formed, rather than coating the entire surface. This localized coating provides strength where needed while minimizing material usage and associated energy consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The device uses composite structures combining flexible plastic layers with metal coatings. This composite approach leverages the flexibility and formability of plastic with the strength and structural integrity of metal, achieving enhanced mechanical properties for moveable features while using thin metal layers that minimize deposition energy requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #40Composite materials

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This method allows for the cost-effective and efficient production of micro-pumps with enhanced mechanical properties, reduced material stress, and lower power consumption, enabling a wide range of flow rates and pressures.

Implementation Method 1

laminating a second sheet of a flexible plastic material to the first sheet to provide a composite laminated structure

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLamination: Lamination

Implementation Method 2

patterning the first sheet includes ablating, and produces the first metallic region and a second metallic region on the first sheet

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAblation: Ablation

Data Source

PatentEP3212931B1Microelectromechanical systems fabricated with roll to roll processing
Publication Date: 2020.08.26 MARSH STEPHEN ALAN
  • EP3212931B1 patent drawingFigure 1A~1B
  • EP3212931B1 patent drawingFigure 2A
  • EP3212931B1 patent drawingFigure 2B

AI summary

Roll to roll processing techniques are described to produce microelectromechanical systems having releasable and moveable mechanical structures. A micro-pump that includes a pump body having compartmentalized pump chambers, with plural inlet and outlet ports and valves and plural membranes enclosing the pump chambers is described as a representative example.