Rolled Product Dispenser With Elastomeric Fins for Rotation Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing rolled product dispensers with braking mechanisms are complex, costly, and difficult to operate, requiring multiple moving parts and additional effort to control rotation and prevent uncontrolled rotation and unraveling of paper products, while also lacking versatility in orientation.

Innovation Solution

A rolled product dispenser featuring a rigid linear core with fixedly attached elastomeric fins that radially extend from a spindle to frictionally inhibit rotation, allowing for minimal loading time and adaptability to both vertical and horizontal surfaces without complex moving parts.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If complex braking mechanisms and rotation control devices are used, then rotation control effectiveness is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation control effectivenessVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the essential friction control function from complex braking mechanisms and rotation control devices, retaining only the necessary frictional elements (fins) while removing unnecessary moving parts and complex control systems. This achieves rotation control effectiveness with minimal device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The friction elements (fins) are designed to automatically engage with the rolled product tube and provide friction-based rotation control without requiring external control mechanisms, adjustment means, or additional moving parts. The system self-regulates rotation through the inherent friction between the fins and the tube.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Reliability

If multiple moving parts and friction adjustment means are introduced, then rotation control capability is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation control capabilityVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes multiple moving parts and friction adjustment means from the design, retaining only the essential friction elements (fins) that provide rotation control capability. This extraction reduces manufacturing complexity and cost while maintaining the necessary rotation control function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The design uses simple, inexpensive friction elements (fins) that can be easily manufactured and replaced if needed, rather than investing in complex, expensive mechanisms with multiple moving parts. The fins provide adequate rotation control at minimal manufacturing cost.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Reliability

If complex braking mechanisms are used, then rotation control is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation controlVSAvoidease of operation
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The friction elements (fins) automatically engage with the rolled product tube and provide rotation control without requiring user intervention, adjustment, or complex operation. The system self-regulates through friction, making operation simple and intuitive.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent removes complex braking mechanisms and rotation control devices that would require user interaction and adjustment, retaining only the simple friction elements that provide automatic, effortless rotation control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

4Measurement precision

If friction adjustment means are added, then rotation control precision is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverotation control precisionVSAvoiddevice complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts the friction control function from complex adjustment mechanisms, using simple friction elements (fins) that provide adequate rotation control precision without requiring adjustment means or complex control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The friction elements self-regulate rotation control through inherent friction between the fins and the rolled product tube, eliminating the need for adjustment means while maintaining appropriate rotation control precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The dispenser effectively prevents uncontrolled rotation and unraveling of rolled products with a simple, cost-effective design that is easy to operate and can be mounted on various surfaces, reducing manufacturing complexity and costs while maintaining aesthetic appeal.

Implementation Method 1

The fins are constructed of an elastomeric material... operatively arranged to impede the rotation of a rolled product tube when sheets of material are torn free from the roll

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUSRE44506E1Rolled product dispenser
Publication Date: 2013.09.24 UMBRA
  • USRE44506E1 patent drawing
  • USRE44506E1 patent drawing
  • USRE44506E1 patent drawing

AI summary

The present invention broadly comprises an apparatus for holding and dispensing rolled products comprising a rigid linear core with a spindle attached to the exterior of the rigid linear core with at least one fin fixedly attached to the spindle. The fins are attached parallel to the spindle, are constructed of an elastomeric material, and extend outwardly and radially from the spindle. Removably attached to the rigid linear core is a head. Also, a base is fixedly attached to the rigid linear core distal to the head. Alternatively, the base can be replaced by a bracket that is capable of being attached to vertical and horizontal surfaces.