Roller Bearing Assembly With Stiff Intermediate Blocks for Overloads

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Rolling bearings designed for low-speed, extreme loads suffer from deformation and damage due to concentrated contact forces, leading to hard spots and play, necessitating oversized, heavy, bulky, and expensive solutions.

Innovation Solution

A bearing assembly with intermediate blocks made of stiffer material than the rolling elements, having complementary bearing faces and varying curvature to distribute load, combining rolling and plain bearing advantages, allowing deformation without damage.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If bearings are oversized to withstand extreme loads, then resistance to occasional overloads is improved, but weight increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to occasional overloadsVSAvoidbearing weight
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSWeight of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The bearing is segmented into two functional systems: rolling elements for normal operation and intermediate blocks for extreme loads. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function, enabling the bearing to handle extreme loads without requiring all components to be oversized, thus reducing overall weight while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the stiffness parameter of different bearing components. Rolling elements are made with lower stiffness to allow elastic deformation and absorb energy during extreme loading, while intermediate blocks have higher stiffness to provide structural support. This parameter differentiation enables the bearing to withstand extreme loads without being uniformly oversized, reducing weight.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If bearings are oversized to withstand extreme loads, then resistance to occasional overloads is improved, but volume increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to occasional overloadsVSAvoidbearing volume
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSVolume of moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The bearing is segmented into two functional systems: rolling elements for normal operation and intermediate blocks for extreme loads. This segmentation allows each component to be optimized for its specific function, enabling the bearing to handle extreme loads without requiring all components to be oversized, thus reducing overall volume while maintaining reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the stiffness parameter of different bearing components. Rolling elements are made with lower stiffness to allow elastic deformation and absorb energy during extreme loading, while intermediate blocks have higher stiffness to provide structural support. This parameter differentiation enables the bearing to withstand extreme loads without being uniformly oversized, reducing volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If contact forces are concentrated on small surfaces, then rolling bearing performance is improved, but deformation and damage occur under heavy loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverolling bearing performanceVSAvoidresistance to deformation and damage
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The invention applies local quality by giving different stiffness characteristics to different parts of the bearing. Rolling elements have lower stiffness for normal rolling operation, while intermediate blocks have higher stiffness for extreme load support. This local differentiation allows concentrated contact forces during normal operation while providing distributed support during extreme loads, preventing deformation and damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the stiffness parameter of different bearing components. Rolling elements are made with lower stiffness to allow elastic deformation and absorb energy during extreme loading, while intermediate blocks have higher stiffness to provide structural support. This parameter differentiation enables the bearing to withstand extreme loads without being uniformly oversized, reducing volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If bearings are designed for extreme loads, then resistance to occasional overloads is improved, but manufacturing cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveresistance to occasional overloadsVSAvoidmanufacturing cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The rolling elements are designed as sacrificial components that can deform elastically during extreme loading events. They are made of less expensive materials with lower stiffness, allowing them to absorb energy through deformation. This approach is more economical than making all bearing components expensive and highly durable, as only the rolling elements need to be replaceable after extreme damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the stiffness parameter of different bearing components. Rolling elements are made with lower stiffness to allow elastic deformation and absorb energy during extreme loading, while intermediate blocks have higher stiffness to provide structural support. This parameter differentiation enables the bearing to withstand extreme loads without being uniformly oversized, reducing volume.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The assembly provides resistance to occasional overloads without hard spots or play, maintaining flexibility and reducing bulk and cost while supporting significant loads.

Implementation Method 1

the rolling elements being made of a defined material... when the bearing is subjected to a load less than a threshold load, the intermediate blocks have a dimension smaller than the rolling elements in directions normal to the raceways, the rings having a stiffness greater than the rolling elements

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElastic deformation: Elasticity

Data Source

PatentEP4433718B1Mechanical roller bearing
Publication Date: 2025.11.05 SAFRAN AIRCRAFT ENGINES SAS
  • EP4433718B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4433718B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP4433718B1 patent drawingFigure 4~5

AI summary

The invention relates to a mechanical roller bearing (2) comprising: - two rings (10, 12), each having a raceway (26), - roller elements (22) arranged between the rings, the roller elements being able to roll against a portion of the raceways, the roller elements being made from a defined material, the mechanical roller comprising a plurality of intermediate blocks (24) arranged between the rings, the intermediate blocks being made from a material having greater rigidity than the rigidity of the material of the roller elements in directions perpendicular to the raceways, and, when the bearing is subjected to loading below a threshold load, the intermediate blocks having dimensions smaller than the roller elements in directions perpendicular to the raceways, the rings (10, 12) having greater rigidity than the roller elements.